Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
27/07/2026 | Willem Beukelszoonstraat 24 Den Haag | € 585.000 € 550.000 | -6.0% | 127 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Pieter van den Zandestraat 11 Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 70 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Marcelisstraat 48 Den Haag | € 675.000 € 595.000 | -11.8% | 146 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Burgemeester Patijnlaan 790 Den Haag | € 485.000 € 425.000 | -12.4% | 69 m² | |||
26/07/2026 | Alexander Gogelweg 69 Den Haag | € 995.000 € 925.000 | -7.0% | 195 m² | |||
25/07/2026 | Statenlaan 146 Den Haag | € 700.000 € 650.000 | -7.1% | 163 m² | |||
25/07/2026 | Juliana van Stolberglaan 372 Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 83 m² | |||
25/07/2026 | Brabantse Turfmarkt 26 Delft | € 895.000 € 845.000 | -5.6% | 194 m² | |||
25/07/2026 | Vlamingstraat 36 B Den Haag | € 399.500 € 375.000 | -6.1% | 72 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Westduinweg 54 A Den Haag | € 435.000 € 395.000 | -9.2% | 81 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Van Alkemadelaan 70 Den Haag | € 1.245.000 € 1.190.000 | -4.4% | 233 m²191 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Zwetstraat 60 Den Haag | € 260.000 € 250.000 | -3.9% | 50 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Thomsonlaan 206 Den Haag | € 550.000 € 495.000 | -10.0% | 122 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Rijswijkseweg 71 C Den Haag | € 369.000 € 349.000 | -5.4% | 94 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Zwartendijk 29 Monster | € 1.129.000 € 1.095.000 | -3.0% | 236 m²1015 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Pisuissestraat 75 Den Haag | € 420.000 € 400.000 | -4.8% | 112 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Louis Couperusplein 52 Den Haag | € 840.000 € 829.500 | -1.3% | 153 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Volmerlaan 4 F035 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 309.500 € 300.000 | -3.1% | 53 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Kerkweg 14 Pijnacker | € 400.000 € 379.000 | -5.3% | 103 m²182 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Mient 138 Den Haag | € 325.000 € 300.000 | -7.7% | 70 m² |
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Burgemeester Patijnlaan 790
Apartment at Burgemeester Patijnlaan 790 in 's-Gravenhage (Archipelbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1979 and has 67 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Spui (1.8 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Archipel (484 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted27 Jul 2026€ 425,000−€ 60,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 485,000
Property details
- Living area
- 67 m²
- Construction year
- 1979
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 355,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Archipelbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable6%
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated200 persons
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure30
- Permits <500 m (3 months)ⓘ
- Very high construction activity11
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.9%
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Traffic on your own streetⓘ
- Very busy (main/motorway)11,250 per day
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)ⓘ
- Deep (0.5–2 m)0.82 m
- Flood risk classⓘ
- High flood risklarge
- Dual designationⓘ
- Cultural-historical valueValue - Cultural heritage
- Shared plotⓘ
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Few solar panels8%
- Distance to military terrainⓘ
- Near military site1 km
- Within Wbb soil locationⓘ
- Within registered soil locationYes
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- High heat stress41 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Multiple industrial businesses4
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)ⓘ
- Elevated2.1 µg/kg
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Noticeably warmer1.2 °C
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Very generous plot5,784 m²
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.787 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away42.9 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)48.2 km
- Distance to nearest emission sourceⓘ
- ample distance1.7 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbineⓘ
- Far away (>2 km)6.3 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
29 permits within 500 m · 13 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
98th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 213 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
92nd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 705 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
84th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 232 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 236 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 401 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
4th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
89th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 413 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
92nd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 215 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
87th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 296 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile: high · DOE · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 432 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
93rd percentile: high · 91% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 115 exam candidates
5th percentile: low · 79% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
99th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 114 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
22nd percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 225 exam candidates
5th percentile: low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 116 exam candidates
61st percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 69 exam candidates
61st percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 175 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
34th percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 142 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.