Price drops in and around Enschede
More homes in and around Enschede whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Burgemeester Van Veenlaan 80
Terraced house at Burgemeester Van Veenlaan 80 in Enschede (Boswinkel-De Braker neighbourhood). The home was built in 1960 and has 180 m² of living space, a 327 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Enschede (1.8 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Sint Jan (318 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced31 Jul 2026€ 400,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 425,000
Property details
- Living area
- 180 m²
- Plot
- 327 m²
- Construction year
- 1960
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 398,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Boswinkel-De Braker, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Liveability class
- Weakweak
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.165 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1111 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share20.5%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High19.6%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)82.9%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)80.9%
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)
- High5.1%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.6%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High3.7%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby18
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside41.2%
- Average lowest groundwater level (GLG)
- Deep, risk of pile rot202 m above sea level
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Elevated emissions62 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Inefficient (label E)334 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- UneconomicalE
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Above-average nuisance8%
- Noise load
- Heavy61 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Disturbing52 dB
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.5%
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Multiple sources3
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.6 °C
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Very spacious plot205 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space143 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential9,766 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Good yield974 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.3%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.605 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits within 500 m · 16 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
40th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 182 pupils
Disadvantage score 49: more disadvantage than 84% of schools
96th percentile: high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 192 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
28th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 7 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 25: more disadvantage than 66% of schools
2nd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 144 pupils
Disadvantage score 63: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
4th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 95 pupils
Disadvantage score 40: more disadvantage than 80% of schools
38th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 105 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
45th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 13 pupils · total 107 pupils
Disadvantage score 38: more disadvantage than 78% of schools
54th percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 333 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
68th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 107 pupils · total 718 pupils
Disadvantage score 1: more disadvantage than 14% of schools
5th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 92 pupils
Disadvantage score 33: more disadvantage than 74% of schools
50th percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 162 exam candidates
18th percentile: low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 96 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
59th percentile: average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 86 exam candidates
8th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 152 exam candidates
46th percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 51 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.