Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Cannemanstraat 25
Apartment at Cannemanstraat 25 in Rotterdam (Kleinpolder neighbourhood). The home was built in 1954 and has 105 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Blijdorp (1.4 km). The nearest primary school is Albert Schweitzer (592 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced22 Jul 2026€ 385,000−€ 14,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 399,000
Property details
- Living area
- 105 m²
- Construction year
- 1954
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 341,000
- Ownership
- Property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Kleinpolder, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport2.6 km
- Distance to motorway
- Very close82 m
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby15
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby8
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside39.6%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot5,456 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical650 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.224 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away24.4 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)28.9 km
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits within 500 m · 30 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
72nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 486 pupils
Disadvantage score 39 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
2nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 171 pupils
Disadvantage score 47 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
53rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 409 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 11% of schools
81st percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 400 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
80th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 186 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 41% of schools
13th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 231 pupils
Disadvantage score 73 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
58th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 227 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
69th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 73 pupils · total 528 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
10th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 434 pupils
Disadvantage score 68 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
11th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 60 pupils · total 501 pupils
Disadvantage score 166 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
1st percentile — low · 65% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 293 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
65th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 71 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 177 exam candidates
9th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · HAVO/VWO · 178 exam candidates
47th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 69 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
19th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 129 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.