Price drops in and around Almere
More homes in and around Almere whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Citadel 84
Apartment at Citadel 84 in Almere (Centrum Stad Zuidoost neighbourhood). The home was built in 2004 and has 120 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Almere Centrum (581 m). The nearest primary school is Basisschool het Samenspel (607 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted28 Jul 2026€ 455,000−€ 34,500
- Listed for sale11 Jun 2026€ 489,500
Property details
- Living area
- 120 m²
- Construction year
- 2004
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- € 458,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Centrum Stad Zuidoost, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.1056 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.2196 score
- Distance to charging point
- No charging point in the neighbourhood1.1 km
- Catering within 300 m
- Very many catering businesses, nightlife area72
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime421.4 per 1,000 residents
- Parking tariff
- Very high rate€ 6.9
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)3%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)85.3%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure12
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High4.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Traffic on your own street
- Very busy (main/motorway)11,250 per day
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside43.1%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Very deep (above 2 m)2.23 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels3%
- Distance to tram/metro line
- Far away14.7 km
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)
- Elevated4.6%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- Elevated1.8%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.2 °C
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Below the national average46%
- Distance to nearest permit
- permit nearby23 m
- Distance to play area/playground
- Play area right next door64 m
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot3,222 m²
- Share of renewable energy
- High share of renewable energy97%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions16 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)44 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical0 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values8.1%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.35 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
11 permits within 500 m · 4 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
3rd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 120 pupils
Disadvantage score 49: more disadvantage than 84% of schools
no recent test score · total 104 pupils
Disadvantage score 65: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
30th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 124 pupils
Disadvantage score 15: more disadvantage than 52% of schools
33rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 9: more disadvantage than 39% of schools
23rd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 408 pupils
Disadvantage score 40: more disadvantage than 80% of schools
43rd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 409 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
52nd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 186 pupils
Disadvantage score 25: more disadvantage than 65% of schools
67th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 203 pupils
Disadvantage score 30: more disadvantage than 71% of schools
11th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 104 pupils
Disadvantage score 48: more disadvantage than 84% of schools
64th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 74 pupils · total 611 pupils
Disadvantage score 1: more disadvantage than 10% of schools
38th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 195 exam candidates
8th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 79 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO
no exam results · PRO
7th percentile: low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 325 exam candidates
2nd percentile: low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 280 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
30th percentile: average · 84% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VWO · 79 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.