Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
De Clercqstraat 134 4
Apartment at De Clercqstraat 134 in Amsterdam (Bellamybuurt-Noord neighbourhood). The home was built in 1931 and has 73 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Rokin (1.8 km). The nearest primary school is De Waterkant (233 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced1 Jul 2026€ 700,000−€ 40,000
- Listed for sale4 Jun 2026€ 740,000
Property details
- Living area
- 73 m²
- Construction year
- 1931
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 701,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Bellamybuurt-Noord, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.3%
- Noise load
- Loud69 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive61 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby23
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Environmental health risk (MGR)
- High environmental health risk7.7%
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)181 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical660 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.652 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away6 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)4.1 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Well away (>2 km)2.8 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
76 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 47 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
72nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 318 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 33% of schools
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 435 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
86th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 286 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
66th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 391 pupils
Disadvantage score 47 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
75th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 272 pupils
Disadvantage score 15 — more disadvantage than 52% of schools
56th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 266 pupils
Disadvantage score 30 — more disadvantage than 71% of schools
85th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 351 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 264 pupils
Disadvantage score 60 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
71st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 346 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
21st percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 183 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 14% of schools
10th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 94 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 67% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 102 exam candidates
91st percentile — high · 92% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 109 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 59 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
19th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 70 exam candidates
35th percentile — average · 86% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VWO · 186 exam candidates
7th percentile — low · 80% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 362 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.