Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Van der Helstplein 10 1
Apartment at Van der Helstplein 10 in Amsterdam (Lizzy Ansinghbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1917 and has 66 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is De Pijp (377 m). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Anne Frank 6e Montessori School (168 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted20 Jul 2026€ 595,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale15 Jun 2026€ 620,000
Property details
- Living area
- 66 m²
- Construction year
- 1917
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 655,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property burdened with leasehold (leasehold end date: 28-02-2061)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Lizzy Ansinghbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.5%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby11
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island1.9 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside38.8%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors37.2%
- Green share within 500 m
- Little greenery4%
- Hospitality within 25 m
- Hospitality within 25 m1
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical640 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.658 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away8.8 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)6.7 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Well away (>2 km)2.5 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)6.9 km
- Distance to railway line
- Far from rail1.3 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
83 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
91st percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 214 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 28% of schools
67th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 292 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 45% of schools
61st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 385 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
62nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 307 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 40% of schools
97th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 275 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
67th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 290 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
84th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 371 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
35th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 173 pupils
Disadvantage score 50 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 259 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 236 pupils
Disadvantage score 42 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
48th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 74 exam candidates
7th percentile — low · 80% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 186 exam candidates
7th percentile — low · 80% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 362 exam candidates
43rd percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 129 exam candidates
12th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO · 68 exam candidates
27th percentile — average · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 100 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 59 exam candidates
92nd percentile — high · 93% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 120 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.