Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Loenermark 384
Apartment at Loenermark 384 in Amsterdam (Loenermark neighbourhood). The home was built in 1976 and has 61 m² of living space. The nearest railway station is Noord (357 m). The nearest primary school is Kindercampus Mokum (338 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced20 Jul 2026€ 35,000−€ 5,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 40,000
Property details
- Living area
- 61 m²
- Construction year
- 1976
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- —
- Energy label
- —
- WOZ value
- € 311,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold (leasehold expiry date: 15-09-2053)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Loenermark, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby11
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside38.5%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors38.5%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away5.4 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated375 persons
- Liveability class
- Weakweak
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,547 m²
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical340 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.495 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away9.3 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)5.3 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
8 permits · 3 construction plans within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
50th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 166 pupils
Disadvantage score 26 — more disadvantage than 67% of schools
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 265 pupils
Disadvantage score 87 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
75th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 229 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 161 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
74th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 364 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
81st percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 266 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 45% of schools
73rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 432 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
49th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 420 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
33rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 268 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
59th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 260 pupils
Disadvantage score 92 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
4th percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 111 exam candidates
64th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 90 exam candidates
38th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 76 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.9 · HAVO/VWO · 96 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
36th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 27 exam candidates
4th percentile — low · 80% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO · 25 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 58% passed · CE avg 5.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 12 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.