Price drops in and around Zaandam
More homes in and around Zaandam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
23/07/2026 | De Faam 22 Zaandam | € 900.000 € 865.000 | -3.9% | 174 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Palestrinastraat 29 1 Amsterdam | € 1.320.000 € 1.285.000 | -2.6% | 89 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Marnixstraat 315 D Amsterdam | € 595.000 € 550.000 | -7.6% | 65 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Blasiusstraat 74 D Amsterdam | € 637.500 € 625.000 | -2.0% | 76 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Haarlemmerstraat 3 D Amsterdam | € 475.000 € 450.000 | -5.3% | 53 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Bos en Lommerplein 97 Amsterdam | € 635.000 € 599.000 | -5.7% | 96 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Romeinsarmsteeg 5 B Amsterdam | € 750.000 € 699.000 | -6.8% | 103 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Fritz Conijnstraat 10 3 Amsterdam | € 340.000 € 325.000 | -4.4% | 68 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Rietveld Schröderpad 15 Amsterdam | € 578.500 € 562.500 | -2.8% | 82 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Achtersteven 24 Amsterdam | € 400.000 € 385.000 | -3.8% | 89 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Don Boscostraat 465 Amsterdam | € 588.000 € 586.000 | -0.3% | 65 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Binnen Brouwersstraat 44 Amsterdam | € 1.250.000 € 1.199.000 | -4.1% | 106 m²23 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Loenermark 384 Amsterdam | € 40.000 € 35.000 | -12.5% | — | |||
20/07/2026 | Rode Zee 31 Zaandam | € 450.000 € 375.000 | -16.7% | 125 m²121 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Pitrus 88 Assendelft | € 699.500 € 669.500 | -4.3% | 141 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Willem de Zwijgerlaan 334 C14 Amsterdam | € 350.000 € 335.000 | -4.3% | 51 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Banne Buikslootlaan 125 Amsterdam | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 61 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Oeverpad 191 Amsterdam | € 585.000 € 550.000 | -6.0% | 122 m² | |||
19/07/2026 | Paulus Potterstraat 24 A Amsterdam | € 4.000.000 € 3.950.000 | -1.3% | 238 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Overtoom 17 Westzaan | € 470.000 € 419.500 | -10.7% | 112 m²89 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
De Faam 22
Apartment at De Faam 22 in Zaandam (Oud West neighbourhood). The home was built in 2005 and has 174 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Zaandam (859 m). The nearest primary school is icbs het Zaanplein (434 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced23 Jul 2026€ 865,000−€ 35,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 900,000
Property details
- Living area
- 174 m²
- Construction year
- 2005
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 819,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Oud West, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Number of building plans within 500 mⓘ
- Much building activity75
- Green share within 500 mⓘ
- Little greenery4%
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)ⓘ
- Low (bottom quarter)10%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)83.1%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)80.5%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure27
- Permits <500 m (3 months)ⓘ
- Very high construction activity11
- Distance to nearest emission sourceⓘ
- very nearby199 m
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- High4.1%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High1.9%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- High4.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High3.1%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby28
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby9
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside40%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors38.6%
- Foundation riskⓘ
- High risklarge
- In area with induced earthquakesⓘ
- In earthquake zoneYes
- Flood risk classⓘ
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plotⓘ
- Shared plotYes
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facilityⓘ
- Nearby (0.5-1 km)632 m
- Distance to tram/metro lineⓘ
- Far away5.7 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Above-average nuisance6.4%
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- Elevated4.4%
- Near waste incinerator/biomass facilityⓘ
- Within ~5 km of waste incinerator / biomass facilityYes
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Noticeably warmer1.5 °C
- Proportion of flexible employment contractsⓘ
- Much flexible work43.2%· NL 27%
- Share of households lowest 40% incomeⓘ
- above-average many low incomes50.1%
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Generous plot349 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)140 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.661 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away5.2 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbineⓘ
- Far away (>2 km)2.1 km
- Distance to military terrainⓘ
- Well away from military terrain5.2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
23 permits · 75 construction plans within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
10th percentile — low · DOE · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 297 pupils
Disadvantage score 75 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
79th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 61 pupils · total 532 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
20th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 61 pupils · total 471 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 72% of schools
no recent test score · total 139 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 39% of schools
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 76 pupils · total 601 pupils
Disadvantage score 95 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
71st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 392 pupils
Disadvantage score 29 — more disadvantage than 70% of schools
43rd percentile — average · DOE · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 351 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
79th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 169 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 14% of schools
78th percentile — high · DOE · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 462 pupils
Disadvantage score 3 — more disadvantage than 22% of schools
3rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 187 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
15th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 191 exam candidates
73rd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 202 exam candidates
62nd percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 128 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 71% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 159 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
53rd percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 143 exam candidates
65th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 218 exam candidates
63rd percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 158 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.