Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Van Neckstraat 33
Apartment at Van Neckstraat 33 in Amsterdam (Zeeheldenbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1915 and has 86 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Centraal Station (1.4 km). The nearest primary school is De Zeeheld (160 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted18 Jun 2026€ 850,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 875,000
Property details
- Living area
- 86 m²
- Construction year
- 1915
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 725,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Zeeheldenbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.1%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby23
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby7
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside39.1%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors36.5%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental56%
- Green share within 500 m
- Little greenery2%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical660 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.492 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away6.6 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)3.1 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)3.1 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
18 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 316 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 34% of schools
55th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 227 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
36th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 390 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 2% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 205 pupils
Disadvantage score 23 — more disadvantage than 63% of schools
68th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 169 pupils
Disadvantage score 25 — more disadvantage than 65% of schools
31st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 366 pupils
Disadvantage score 19 — more disadvantage than 58% of schools
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 83 pupils · total 560 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
19th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 153 pupils
Disadvantage score 19 — more disadvantage than 58% of schools
no recent test score · total 126 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
89th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 359 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
19th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 70 exam candidates
60th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 111 exam candidates
29th percentile — average · 85% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 67% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 102 exam candidates
38th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 88 exam candidates
10th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 94 exam candidates
4th percentile — low · 80% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO · 25 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
36th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 27 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 58% passed · CE avg 5.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 12 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.