Price drops in and around Appingedam
More homes in and around Appingedam whose asking price was recently cut.
Over the past 30 days we tracked 6 price cuts in and around Appingedam, averaging −5.8%. The biggest cut was € 54.000 (Willemstraat 68, Delfzijl). Last updated 16 September.
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
For sale-7.7%
For sale-7.0%
For sale-10.8%
For sale-6.1%
For sale-1.7%
For sale-1.4%
For sale-9.3%
For sale-6.0%
Sold (conditional)-8.0%
Sold (conditional)-4.0%
For sale-3.2%
Under offer-9.1%
Sold (conditional)-1.5%
For sale-10.1%
Sold (conditional)-5.1%
Huisverklikker Chrome extensionIndicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
De Haas Okkenstraat 18
Semi-detached at De Haas Okkenstraat 18 in Appingedam (Opwierde Noord neighbourhood). The home was built in 1938 and has 85 m² of living space, a 189 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Appingedam (801 m). The nearest primary school is Basisschool De Vuurvlinder (565 m).
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Price & status history
- Relistedtoday€ 300,000−€ 25,000
- Off Funda2 Sept 2026
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 325,000
At a glance
Click a card for the explanation and source.
- 25.3% With children−6.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 47% Single-person+6.9 pt vs the Netherlands
- 27.7% Other multi-personsame as the Netherlands
- 32% Owner-occupied−25 pt vs the Netherlands
- 61% Social housing+33 pt vs the Netherlands
- 7% Private rental−7 pt vs the Netherlands
- 78% Dutch background+5.9 pt vs the Netherlands
- 5.3% Rest of Europe−4 pt vs the Netherlands
- 16.8% Outside Europe−1.7 pt vs the Netherlands
- 36% Lower+10 pt vs the Netherlands
- 51.7% Intermediate+11 pt vs the Netherlands
- 12.4% Higher−20.9 pt vs the Netherlands
Share of adults in the neighbourhood who are (very) satisfied, RIVM Health Monitor 2024. The bar lines the neighbourhood up against all 11,734 neighbourhoods with a figure in the monitor: half of them sit between 87 and 93 percent, so a few points move a neighbourhood from the middle to the tail. "Not (very) satisfied" is neutral and dissatisfied together, because the monitor does not publish those two separately. A neighbourhood average, so it says nothing about this particular home.
Shares in the Opwierde Noord neighbourhood, source CBS. Each share is rounded on its own, so the total can land just off 100.
58 reports in the neighbourhood over the latest full year
- 33.9% Theft / burglary−5.1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 33.9% Othersame as the Netherlands
- 21.4% Violence and threats+11.4 pt vs the Netherlands
- 8.9% Vandalismsame as the Netherlands
- 1.8% Public order−6.9 pt vs the Netherlands
Source Police/CBS, neighbourhood level, latest full calendar year. Only crimes reported to the police; willingness to report differs by offence and by area. A neighbourhood with shops or nightlife counts visitors’ reports too, so busy does not automatically mean unsafe.
Liveability class: sufficient
Leefbaarometer 3.0 (Dutch Ministry of the Interior / RIGO), 2024 edition. The scale is by definition a deviation from the national average: 0 IS the Netherlands, and that is the tick on the bar. The bar itself is the place among all neighbourhoods, because they do not sit symmetrically around zero: the same small minus is mid-pack on one sub-scale and the tail on another. A model score for the whole neighbourhood, not a measurement at this address. Resident mix stays grey: a different population is not better or worse, only different.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods. The national figure comes from the same table and the same formula, so the comparison is between places rather than between definitions.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods.
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
33 permits within 500 m · 300 construction plans within 1 km · 24 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Features
Stations
Schools
21st percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 141 pupils
Disadvantage score 44: more disadvantage than 82% of schools
6th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 130 pupils
Disadvantage score 26: more disadvantage than 67% of schools
16th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 296 pupils
Disadvantage score 25: more disadvantage than 66% of schools
99th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 194 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile: high · DIA · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 202 pupils
Disadvantage score 77: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
2nd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 5 pupils · total 47 pupils
Disadvantage score 29: more disadvantage than 70% of schools
47th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 308 pupils
Disadvantage score 18: more disadvantage than 57% of schools
29th percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 204 pupils
Disadvantage score 20: more disadvantage than 59% of schools
36th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 67 pupils
Disadvantage score 1: more disadvantage than 11% of schools
19th percentile: low · DIA · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 200 pupils
Disadvantage score 98: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
32nd percentile: average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 117 exam candidates
32nd percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.