Price drops in and around Zaandam
More homes in and around Zaandam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
De Steven 29
Apartment at De Steven 29 in Zaandam (Rosmolenbuurt West neighbourhood). The home was built in 2001 and has 113 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Zaandam (1 km). The nearest primary school is icbs het Zaanplein (393 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted1 Jul 2026€ 495,000−€ 5,000
- For sale29 Jun 2026
- Under offer26 Jun 2026
- Relisted10 Jun 2026€ 500,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 525,000
Property details
- Living area
- 113 m²
- Construction year
- 2001
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 478,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Rosmolenbuurt West, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance to nearest emission source
- very nearby170 m
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- High4.1%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High1.9%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High4.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.1%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby27
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby8
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside39.6%
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot4,458 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical740 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.661 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away5.3 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)2.2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
21 permits · 103 construction plans within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
10th percentile — low · DOE · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 297 pupils
Disadvantage score 75 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
20th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 61 pupils · total 471 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 72% of schools
79th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 61 pupils · total 532 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no recent test score · total 139 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 39% of schools
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 76 pupils · total 601 pupils
Disadvantage score 95 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
79th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 169 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 14% of schools
43rd percentile — average · DOE · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 351 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
13th percentile — low · DOE · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 269 pupils
Disadvantage score 60 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
78th percentile — high · DOE · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 462 pupils
Disadvantage score 3 — more disadvantage than 22% of schools
2nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 239 pupils
Disadvantage score 62 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
15th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 191 exam candidates
62nd percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 128 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 71% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 159 exam candidates
73rd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 202 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
53rd percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 143 exam candidates
65th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 218 exam candidates
63rd percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 158 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.