Price drops in and around Alphen aan den Rijn
More homes in and around Alphen aan den Rijn whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Dillenburgstraat 30
Apartment at Dillenburgstraat 30 in Alphen aan den Rijn (Bospark neighbourhood). The home was built in 1959 and has 69 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Alphen aan den Rijn (1.1 km). The nearest primary school is Protestants Christelijke Basisschool Samen Op Weg (121 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted16 Jul 2026€ 299,000−€ 16,000
- Sold10 Jun 2026€ 315,000
Property details
- Living area
- 69 m²
- Construction year
- 1959
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 304,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Bospark, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby10
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby10
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside41.9%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors41.8%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Share of households lowest 40% income
- strong concentration of low incomes68.5%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away15.3 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated85 persons
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,905 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical550 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values12.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.791 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away31.2 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)31.2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
13 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 18 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
66th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 142 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 55% of schools
35th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 98 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
60th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 175 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
31st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 149 pupils
Disadvantage score 3 — more disadvantage than 22% of schools
92nd percentile — high · DIA · grade 8: 13 pupils · total 89 pupils
Disadvantage score 33 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
67th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 372 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
77th percentile — high · DIA · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 165 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
56th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 60 pupils · total 446 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
27th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 149 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
65th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 257 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 47% of schools
no exam results · PRO
77th percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 185 exam candidates
80th percentile — high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 279 exam candidates
87th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 132 exam candidates
35th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VWO · 109 exam candidates
16th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 305 exam candidates
69th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 131 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
76th percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO · 129 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.