Price drops in and around Hoensbroek
More homes in and around Hoensbroek whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Dr. Martin Luther Kinglaan 141
Terraced house at Dr. Martin Luther Kinglaan 141 in Hoensbroek (De Dem en omgeving neighbourhood). The home was built in 1973 and has 118 m² of living space, a 182 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Hoensbroek (2.2 km). The nearest primary school is Kindcentrum Paulus (419 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced31 Jul 2026€ 260,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale5 Jun 2026€ 280,000
Property details
- Living area
- 118 m²
- Plot
- 182 m²
- Construction year
- 1973
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 218,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in De Dem en omgeving, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.1005 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share25.8%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High23.5%
- Overweight (neighbourhood)
- Much higher than average61%
- Distance to charging point
- No charging point in the neighbourhood2.9 km
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away5.4 km
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place1.75 ratio
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)83.9%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)76.9%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.7%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.2%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High4.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.5%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress48 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby12
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- In area with induced earthquakes
- In earthquake zoneYes
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Elevated emissions51 kg/m2/yr
- Distance to airport
- Nearby12 km
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)
- Elevated4.6%
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Multiple sources4
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.5 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Below the national average47.7%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Below the national average56.2%
- Masts within 300 m
- Multiple transmission masts3
- Proportion of flexible employment contracts
- Much flexible work32.2%· NL 27%
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot113 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space68 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential4,857 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,023 kWh/kWp/yr
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Far below national average€ 238,000
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.2%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.564 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 construction plan within 500 m · 30 zoning plan amendments within 5 km.
Schools
41st percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 130 pupils
Disadvantage score 55: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
51st percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 285 pupils
Disadvantage score 78: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
39th percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 350 pupils
Disadvantage score 56: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
35th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 319 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
36th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 235 pupils
Disadvantage score 47: more disadvantage than 83% of schools
2nd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 152 pupils
Disadvantage score 8: more disadvantage than 37% of schools
44th percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 239 pupils
Disadvantage score 28: more disadvantage than 70% of schools
54th percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 163 pupils
Disadvantage score 27: more disadvantage than 68% of schools
76th percentile: high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 200 pupils
Disadvantage score 67: more disadvantage than 92% of schools
31st percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 397 pupils
Disadvantage score 125: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
38th percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 83 exam candidates
79th percentile: high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 93 exam candidates
61st percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 170 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
47th percentile: average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.1 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 27 exam candidates
94th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 107 exam candidates
15th percentile: low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 119 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.