Price drops in and around Heerlen
More homes in and around Heerlen whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Adenauerlaan 53
Apartment at Adenauerlaan 53 in Heerlen (Uterweg neighbourhood). The home was built in 1996 and has 71 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Hoensbroek (3.5 km). The nearest primary school is Rooms Katholieke Basisschool De Schakel (417 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted24 Jul 2026€ 175,000−€ 14,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 189,000
Property details
- Living area
- 71 m²
- Construction year
- 1996
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 167,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Uterweg, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated100 persons
- Liveability class
- Weakweak
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.2519 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.17 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share25.1%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High24.8%
- Overweight (neighbourhood)
- Much higher than average63.1%
- Distance to charging point
- No charging point in the neighbourhood1.8 km
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)86.3%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)77.8%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.9%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.2%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High4.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.5%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby11
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Average lowest groundwater level (GLG)
- Deep, risk of pile rot234 m above sea level
- In area with induced earthquakes
- In earthquake zoneYes
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Distance to nearest transmission mast
- Transmission mast nearby (<100 m)55 m
- Distance to military terrain
- Near military site1.1 km
- Distance to airport
- Nearby13.8 km
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)
- Elevated4.6%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Below the national average55.8%
- Proportion of flexible employment contracts
- Much flexible work35.4%· NL 27%
- Share of households lowest 40% income
- above-average many low incomes51.3%
- Share of persons in poverty
- Above average7.5%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,738 m²
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average33%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Far below national average€ 238,000
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.2%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.529 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away116.1 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 construction plan within 500 m · 29 zoning plan amendments within 5 km.
Schools
76th percentile: high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 177 pupils
Disadvantage score 72: more disadvantage than 93% of schools
11th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 205 pupils
Disadvantage score 5: more disadvantage than 27% of schools
2nd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 152 pupils
Disadvantage score 8: more disadvantage than 37% of schools
36th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 235 pupils
Disadvantage score 47: more disadvantage than 83% of schools
41st percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 130 pupils
Disadvantage score 55: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
85th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 151 pupils
Disadvantage score 28: more disadvantage than 69% of schools
54th percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 163 pupils
Disadvantage score 27: more disadvantage than 68% of schools
76th percentile: high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 200 pupils
Disadvantage score 67: more disadvantage than 92% of schools
99th percentile: high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 270 pupils
Disadvantage score 1: more disadvantage than 11% of schools
35th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 319 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
79th percentile: high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 93 exam candidates
47th percentile: average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.1 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 27 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
61st percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 170 exam candidates
38th percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 83 exam candidates
94th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 107 exam candidates
15th percentile: low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 119 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
99th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VBO · 19 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.