Price drops in and around Heerlen
More homes in and around Heerlen whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
De Heugden 122
Apartment at De Heugden 122 in Heerlen (Eikenderveld neighbourhood). The home was built in 1980 and has 89 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Heerlen (329 m). The nearest primary school is Rooms Katholieke Basisschool Eikenderveld (204 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced24 Jul 2026€ 239,000−€ 6,000
- Listed for sale5 Jun 2026€ 245,000
Property details
- Living area
- 89 m²
- Construction year
- 1980
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 222,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Eikenderveld, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of households lowest 40% income
- strong concentration of low incomes66.4%
- Severe loneliness (neighbourhood)
- High20.8%
- Experienced health (very) good (neighbourhood)
- clearly below national average63.8%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated195 persons
- Liveability class
- Weakweak
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.1786 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1231 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share28.8%
- Net labour participation
- Low58%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High21.2%
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)79.7%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)71.4%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance10.9%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.2%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High4.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.5%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby9
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside37.2%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors44.4%
- Average lowest groundwater level (GLG)
- Deep, risk of pile rot174 m above sea level
- In area with induced earthquakes
- In earthquake zoneYes
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels8%
- Distance to railway line
- Close to railway180 m
- Distance to airport
- Nearby14.3 km
- Road traffic noise
- Considerable noise12.2%
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)
- Elevated4.6%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- High heat stress41 °C
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.7 °C
- Share of social assistance recipients
- Elevated5.5%
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot2,360 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical650 m³
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Far below national average€ 238,000
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.2%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.544 µg/m³
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)16.5 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Well away (>2 km)2.8 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 22 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
92nd percentile: high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 125 pupils
Disadvantage score 30: more disadvantage than 71% of schools
64th percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 240 pupils
Disadvantage score 35: more disadvantage than 76% of schools
91st percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 415 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
71st percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 220 pupils
Disadvantage score 60: more disadvantage than 90% of schools
100th percentile: high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 241 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
60th percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 274 pupils
Disadvantage score 94: more disadvantage than 97% of schools
14th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 353 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 5% of schools
40th percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 167 pupils
Disadvantage score 58: more disadvantage than 89% of schools
46th percentile: average · DOE · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 276 pupils
Disadvantage score 61: more disadvantage than 90% of schools
41st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 178 pupils
Disadvantage score 9: more disadvantage than 38% of schools
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
15th percentile: low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 119 exam candidates
94th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 107 exam candidates
99th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VBO · 19 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO
100th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 7.1 · VBO · 33 exam candidates
21st percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VWO · 62 exam candidates
19th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO · 49 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.