Price drops in and around Heerlen
More homes in and around Heerlen whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Muzenlaan 276
Apartment at Muzenlaan 276 in Heerlen ('t Loon neighbourhood). The home was built in 1962 and has 102 m² of living space, 4 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Heerlen (511 m). The nearest primary school is Rooms Katholieke Basisschool Eikenderveld (259 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced27 Jul 2026€ 149,000−€ 16,000
- Listed for sale24 Jun 2026€ 165,000
Property details
- Living area
- 102 m²
- Construction year
- 1962
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 190,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in 't Loon, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated210 persons
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share25.3%
- Net labour participation
- Low60%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High17.2%
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime204 per 1,000 residents
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)86.7%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.2%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High4.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.5%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby11
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside40.1%
- Average lowest groundwater level (GLG)
- Deep, risk of pile rot174 m above sea level
- In area with induced earthquakes
- In earthquake zoneYes
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels1%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Elevated emissions56 kg/m2/yr
- Distance to nearest transmission mast
- Transmission mast nearby (<100 m)65 m
- Distance to airport
- Nearby14.4 km
- Road traffic noise
- Considerable noise14.7%
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)
- Elevated4.6%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.5 °C
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Below the national average47.9%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot5,160 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical60 m³
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Far below national average€ 238,000
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.2%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.576 µg/m³
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)16.8 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Well away (>2 km)3 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
22 zoning plan amendments within 5 km.
Schools
92nd percentile: high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 125 pupils
Disadvantage score 30: more disadvantage than 71% of schools
91st percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 415 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
100th percentile: high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 241 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
64th percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 240 pupils
Disadvantage score 35: more disadvantage than 76% of schools
14th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 353 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 5% of schools
71st percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 220 pupils
Disadvantage score 60: more disadvantage than 90% of schools
60th percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 274 pupils
Disadvantage score 94: more disadvantage than 97% of schools
40th percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 167 pupils
Disadvantage score 58: more disadvantage than 89% of schools
69th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 380 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
46th percentile: average · DOE · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 276 pupils
Disadvantage score 61: more disadvantage than 90% of schools
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
21st percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VWO · 62 exam candidates
19th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO · 49 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
11th percentile: low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.2 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 47 exam candidates
5th percentile: low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 102 exam candidates
41st percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
24th percentile: low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 263 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.