Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Elektroweg 6 A
Terraced house at Elektroweg 6 in Rotterdam (Hillegersberg Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1924 and has 95 m² of living space, a 99 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label A+++. The nearest railway station is Rotterdam Noord (531 m). The nearest primary school is De Bergse Zonnebloem (66 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted22 Jul 2026€ 540,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 565,000
Property details
- Living area
- 95 m²
- Plot
- 99 m²
- Construction year
- 1924
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A+++
- WOZ value
- € 263,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Hillegersberg Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport2.9 km
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby9
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside44.3%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors41.6%
- Hospitality within 25 m
- Hospitality within 25 m1
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Share of renewable energy
- High share of renewable energy89%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions3 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space56 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)14 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+++
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential3,929 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,003 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
21 permits within 500 m · 26 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
43rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 385 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 317 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
69th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 125 pupils
Disadvantage score 22 — more disadvantage than 61% of schools
93rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 223 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
12th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 204 pupils
Disadvantage score 95 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 217 pupils
Disadvantage score 62 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 261 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
20th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 173 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
50th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 141 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
23rd percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 141 pupils
Disadvantage score 51 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
33rd percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 182 exam candidates
75th percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 92 exam candidates
66th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 67 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
5th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 70 exam candidates
51st percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 41 exam candidates
4th percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 71 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
3rd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 224 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.