Price drops in and around Hengelo (OV)
More homes in and around Hengelo (OV) whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Flemingstraat 42
Semi-detached at Flemingstraat 42 in Hengelo (Woolde neighbourhood). The home was built in 1974 and has 183 m² of living space, a 317 m² plot, 6 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Hengelo Gezondheidspark (694 m). The nearest primary school is IKC De Wooldermarke (553 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted1 Aug 2026€ 470,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 485,000
Property details
- Living area
- 183 m²
- Plot
- 317 m²
- Construction year
- 1974
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 6
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 449,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Woolde, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Buildings under construction in the neighbourhood
- intensive building activity59 buildings
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure11
- Serious noise nuisance from trains (neighbourhood)
- Strong rail nuisance4.2%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High1.7%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby12
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby8
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Average lowest groundwater level (GLG)
- Deep, risk of pile rot176 m above sea level
- Distance to nearest emission source
- nearby267 m
- Capacity nearest WWTP
- Large treatment plant176,400 i.e.
- Noise load
- Heavy62 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Disturbing53 dB
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated2%
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)
- Elevated4.8%
- Near waste incinerator/biomass facility
- Within ~5 km of waste incinerator / biomass facilityYes
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.4 °C
- Proportion of flexible employment contracts
- Much flexible work33%· NL 27%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Very spacious plot200 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Many solar panels42%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space130 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential8,844 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Good yield972 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.9%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 construction plans within 500 m · 12 zoning plan amendments within 5 km.
Schools
94th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 6: more disadvantage than 30% of schools
2nd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 172 pupils
Disadvantage score 1: more disadvantage than 13% of schools
78th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 387 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
47th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 379 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
21st percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 280 pupils
Disadvantage score 8: more disadvantage than 38% of schools
47th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 198 pupils
Disadvantage score 1: more disadvantage than 11% of schools
50th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 369 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
4th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 56: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
78th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 338 pupils
Disadvantage score 26: more disadvantage than 66% of schools
42nd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 170 pupils
Disadvantage score 27: more disadvantage than 68% of schools
35th percentile: average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 242 exam candidates
84th percentile: high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 77 exam candidates
6th percentile: low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 277 exam candidates
34th percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 143 exam candidates
37th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 57 exam candidates
92nd percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 185 exam candidates
13th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 120 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.