Price drops in and around Helmond
More homes in and around Helmond whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Frans Joseph van Thielpark 171
Apartment at Frans Joseph van Thielpark 171 in Helmond (Steenweg en omgeving neighbourhood). The home was built in 1999 and has 305 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Helmond (747 m). The nearest primary school is Kindcentrum Westwijzer (749 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced25 Jun 2026€ 1,050,000−€ 45,000
- Relisted24 Jun 2026€ 1,095,000+€ 196,000
- Relisted12 Jun 2026€ 899,000−€ 196,000
- Listed for sale30 May 2026€ 1,095,000
Property details
- Living area
- 305 m²
- Construction year
- 1999
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 855,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Steenweg en omgeving, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Very close (<500 m)343 m
- Distance to nearest emission source
- very nearby180 m
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High3.9%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby30
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby18
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)10%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot2,206 m²
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average32%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values13.6%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.632 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away60 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
13 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 24 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
10th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 63 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
52nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 437 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
20th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 61 pupils · total 383 pupils
Disadvantage score 87 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
80th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 202 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
14th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 269 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 44% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 336 pupils
Disadvantage score 67 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 66 pupils · total 537 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 44% of schools
32nd percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 300 pupils
Disadvantage score 75 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
23rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 381 pupils
Disadvantage score 103 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 360 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
31st percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 139 exam candidates
78th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 124 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO
no exam results · PRO
53rd percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 282 exam candidates
55th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 239 exam candidates
25th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 71 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.