Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Fritz Conijnstraat 10 3
Apartment at Fritz Conijnstraat 10 in Amsterdam (Coronelbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1955 and has 91 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label E. The nearest railway station is De Vlugtlaan (521 m). The nearest primary school is Islamitische Basisschool El Amien II (377 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced21 Jul 2026€ 325,000−€ 15,000
- For sale16 Jun 2026
- Under offer12 Jun 2026
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 340,000
Property details
- Living area
- 91 m²
- Construction year
- 1955
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 360,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold (leasehold expiry: 01-05-2029)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Coronelbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby35
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby7
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors43.1%
- Wind turbines within 3 km
- Many wind turbines nearby9
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated105 persons
- Livability Meter: housing stock
- Clearly below average-0.1482 score
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot674 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.66 µg/m³
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.2 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)2.1 km
- Distance to overhead high-voltage line
- Well away4,152 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
23 permits within 500 m · 40 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 363 pupils
Disadvantage score 43 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 266 pupils
Disadvantage score 70 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
7th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 174 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 72% of schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 295 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
51st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 161 pupils
Disadvantage score 41 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 414 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
56th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 110 pupils
Disadvantage score 22 — more disadvantage than 62% of schools
60th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 231 pupils
Disadvantage score 22 — more disadvantage than 61% of schools
no recent test score · total 38 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 24% of schools
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 245 pupils
Disadvantage score 65 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
0th percentile — low · 61% passed · CE avg 5.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 89 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 52% passed · CE avg 5.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
43rd percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 35 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
10th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 94 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.