Price drops in and around Arnhem
More homes in and around Arnhem whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Hanzestraat 182
Apartment at Hanzestraat 182 in Arnhem (Winkelcentrum neighbourhood). The home was built in 1966 and has 81 mΒ² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Arnhem Presikhaaf (859 m). The nearest primary school is Kindcentrum De Werf (409 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted28 Jul 2026β¬ 250,000ββ¬ 10,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026β¬ 260,000
Property details
- Living area
- 81 mΒ²
- Construction year
- 1966
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- β¬ 238,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- β
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Winkelcentrum, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of households lowest 40% income
- strong concentration of low incomes76.3%
- Share of persons in poverty
- High poverty10.9%
- Liveability class
- Weakweak
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.2577 score
- Livability Meter: housing stock
- Clearly below average-0.1962 score
- Smokers (neighbourhood)
- Many smokers30%
- High stress (neighbourhood)
- Much stress30.3%
- Distance to charging point
- No charging point in the neighbourhood1 km
- Hospitality within 25 m
- Hospitality within 25 m1
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime178.9 per 1,000 residents
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)74%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)72.8%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure6
- Soil standard exceeded
- Standard exceededYes
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.2%
- Noise load
- Loud68 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive58 dB
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High3.8%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.6%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress48 Β°C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby9
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside26.6%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors29.8%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Very deep (above 2 m)4.12 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels2%
- Number of soil surveys
- Soil survey registered2
- Distance to tram/metro line
- Far away3.9 km
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.2%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- Elevated1.3%
- Near waste incinerator/biomass facility
- Within ~5 km of waste incinerator / biomass facilityYes
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.5 Β°C
- Traffic on your own street
- Busy through traffic route7,500 per day
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot12,931 mΒ²
- Calculated COβ emissions
- Low emissions20 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)90 kWh/mΒ²/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical180 mΒ³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.7%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SOβ
- Very low0.6 Β΅g/mΒ³
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)20 km
- Distance to military terrain
- Well away from military terrain5.1 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
6 permits within 500 m Β· 21 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permitβs description.
Schools
30th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 45 pupils Β· total 349 pupils
Disadvantage score 122: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
4th percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 20 pupils Β· total 176 pupils
Disadvantage score 49: more disadvantage than 84% of schools
87th percentile: high Β· ROUTE 8 Β· grade 8: 19 pupils Β· total 298 pupils
Disadvantage score 46: more disadvantage than 82% of schools
6th percentile: low Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 13 pupils Β· total 196 pupils
Disadvantage score 99: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
83rd percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 37 pupils Β· total 280 pupils
Disadvantage score 10: more disadvantage than 43% of schools
33rd percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 18 pupils Β· total 119 pupils
Disadvantage score 30: more disadvantage than 72% of schools
22nd percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 15 pupils Β· total 158 pupils
Disadvantage score 45: more disadvantage than 82% of schools
95th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 60 pupils Β· total 472 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
40th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 15 pupils Β· total 249 pupils
Disadvantage score 121: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
57th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 59 pupils Β· total 372 pupils
Disadvantage score 17: more disadvantage than 55% of schools
no exam results Β· VBO/MAVO
81st percentile: high Β· 97% passed Β· CE avg 6.6 Β· VBO/MAVO Β· 91 exam candidates
no exam results Β· PRO
no exam results Β· BRUGJAAR
41st percentile: average Β· 88% passed Β· CE avg 6.5 Β· HAVO/VWO Β· 217 exam candidates
no exam results Β· BRUGJAAR
33rd percentile: average Β· 84% passed Β· CE avg 6.6 Β· VWO Β· 109 exam candidates
53rd percentile: average Β· 92% passed Β· CE avg 6.5 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO Β· 153 exam candidates
no exam results Β· VBO/MAVO
74th percentile: average Β· 99% passed Β· CE avg 6.4 Β· VBO/MAVO Β· 83 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data Β· raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.