Price drops in and around Rheden
More homes in and around Rheden whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
27/07/2026 | St. Antonielaan 223 1 Arnhem | € 449.000 € 425.000 | -5.3% | 106 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Javastraat 21 Arnhem | € 280.000 € 250.000 | -10.7% | 69 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Eduard van Beinumlaan 23 Dieren | € 425.000 € 395.000 | -7.1% | 110 m²156 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Kwekerijstraat garage J-23 Arnhem | € 41.000 € 39.000 | -4.9% | — | |||
22/07/2026 | Zutphensestraatweg 57 Velp (GE) | € 650.000 € 629.500 | -3.1% | 126 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Kersenbongerd 7 Huissen | € 445.000 € 425.000 | -4.5% | 135 m²157 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Roermondsplein 38 1 Arnhem | € 435.000 € 385.000 | -11.5% | 83 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Utrechtsestraat 33 3 Arnhem | € 285.000 € 265.000 | -7.0% | 79 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Acaciastraat 4 Zevenaar | € 950.000 € 920.000 | -3.2% | 280 m²946 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Hofsingel 23 B Arnhem | € 32.500 € 27.500 | -15.4% | — | |||
16/07/2026 | Jane Addamsstraat 13 Arnhem | € 539.000 € 525.000 | -2.6% | 135 m²215 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Walstraat 4 8 Arnhem | € 550.000 € 495.000 | -10.0% | 142 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Harderwijkerweg 28 Dieren | € 515.000 € 489.000 | -5.0% | 155 m²230 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Den Heuvel 126 Velp (GE) | € 275.000 € 260.000 | -5.5% | 79 m² | |||
14/07/2026 | Prümelaan 34 Arnhem | € 1.095.000 € 1.050.000 | -4.1% | 197 m²316 m² | 0 1 0 | ||
13/07/2026 | De Wiltstraat 43 Arnhem | € 275.000 € 250.000 | -9.1% | 43 m² | |||
13/07/2026 | Dominicanenweg 47 Arnhem | € 639.500 € 619.500 | -3.1% | 135 m² | |||
10/07/2026 | Bouriciusstraat 8 Arnhem | € 1.050.000 € 998.000 | -5.0% | 232 m²172 m² | |||
10/07/2026 | Nieboerstraat 5 Dieren | € 400.000 € 395.000 | -1.3% | 107 m²223 m² | |||
09/07/2026 | Klaverlaan 16 Arnhem | € 249.500 € 239.500 | -4.0% | 53 m² |
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Veerweg 72
Semi-detached at Veerweg 72 in Rheden (Rheden neighbourhood). The home was built in 1931 and has 141 m² of living space, a 185 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label G. The nearest railway station is Rheden (448 m). The nearest primary school is Christelijke Basisschool De Holtbanck (423 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted28 Jul 2026€ 499,000−€ 1,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 500,000
Property details
- Living area
- 141 m²
- Plot
- 185 m²
- Construction year
- 1931
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- G
- WOZ value
- € 448,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Rheden, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- High emissions134 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Poor (label F/G)570 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- PoorG
- Obesity (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- High17.8%
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away10.1 km
- Hospitality within 25 mⓘ
- Hospitality within 25 m1
- GPs within 3 kmⓘ
- Few GPs nearby2
- Children per primary school place (proxy)ⓘ
- Many children per place21.11 ratio
- Secondary schools within 3 kmⓘ
- No secondary school within 3 km0
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High7.1%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- High4.5%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Number of hazardous installations (REV) within 1 kmⓘ
- Cluster of risky facilities nearby4
- Average lowest groundwater level (GLG)ⓘ
- Deep, risk of pile rot254 m above sea level
- Dual designationⓘ
- Archaeological protectionValue - Archaeology 2
- Distance to tram/metro lineⓘ
- Far away8.2 km
- Serious noise nuisance from trains (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Heavy train noise2.9%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- Elevated1.7%
- Near waste incinerator/biomass facilityⓘ
- Within ~5 km of waste incinerator / biomass facilityYes
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Noticeably warmer1.1 °C
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Below the national average56.7%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Below the national average56.5%
- Masts within 300 mⓘ
- Multiple transmission masts4
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot areaⓘ
- Spacious plot92 m²
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Above average36%
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space133 m²
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Very high potential9,202 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield989 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values11.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.531 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit within 500 m · 12 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
26th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 168 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
19th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 106 pupils
Disadvantage score 16: more disadvantage than 53% of schools
19th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 222 pupils
Disadvantage score 17: more disadvantage than 55% of schools
78th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 122 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
61st percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 172 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 7% of schools
23rd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 186 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
63rd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 190 pupils
Disadvantage score 17: more disadvantage than 55% of schools
58th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 375 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
33rd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 119 pupils
Disadvantage score 30: more disadvantage than 72% of schools
79th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 13 pupils · total 63 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
63rd percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 147 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
53rd percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 153 exam candidates
68th percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.7 · HAVO/VWO · 91 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.