Price drops in and around Landsmeer
More homes in and around Landsmeer whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Knokkestraat 65 Amsterdam | € 619.100 € 619.000 | -0.0% | 125 m²62 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Parosstraat 6 Amsterdam | € 1.695.000 € 1.495.000 | -11.8% | 258 m²385 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Willem de Zwijgerlaan 334 C14 Amsterdam | € 350.000 € 335.000 | -4.3% | 51 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Banne Buikslootlaan 125 Amsterdam | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 61 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Oeverpad 191 Amsterdam | € 585.000 € 550.000 | -6.0% | 122 m² | |||
19/07/2026 | Paulus Potterstraat 24 A Amsterdam | € 4.000.000 € 3.950.000 | -1.3% | 238 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Overtoom 17 Westzaan | € 470.000 € 419.500 | -10.7% | 112 m²89 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Cornelis Vermuydenstraat 92 Amsterdam | € 550.000 € 525.000 | -4.5% | 65 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Surinameplein 10 H Amsterdam | € 1.265.000 € 1.095.000 | -13.4% | 171 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Sibogastraat 93 Amsterdam | € 500.000 € 450.000 | -10.0% | 63 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Tweede Boerhaavestraat 70 1 Amsterdam | € 550.000 € 525.000 | -4.5% | 62 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Kloveniersburgwal 99 F Amsterdam | € 695.000 € 675.000 | -2.9% | 74 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Ceintuurbaan 167 3 Amsterdam | € 1.250.000 € 1.245.000 | -0.4% | 149 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Koningsvarenstraat 65 Wormer | € 425.000 € 415.000 | -2.4% | 100 m²211 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Olof Palmeplein 55 Amsterdam | € 400.000 € 395.000 | -1.3% | 76 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Egelantiersstraat 122 D Amsterdam | € 500.000 € 485.000 | -3.0% | 62 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Durgerdammerdijk 173 Amsterdam | € 3.800.000 € 3.500.000 | -7.9% | 439 m²12680 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Middenweg 402 Amsterdam | € 675.000 € 625.000 | -7.4% | 95 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Korte Geuzenstraat 700 Amsterdam | € 110.000 € 107.500 | -2.3% | — | |||
16/07/2026 | Nicolaas Witsenstraat 2 D Amsterdam | € 599.000 € 575.000 | -4.0% | 50 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Harpoenier 35
Terraced house at Harpoenier 35 in Landsmeer (Luijendijk neighbourhood). The home was built in 1988 and has 92 m² of living space, a 121 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Noord (3.8 km). The nearest primary school is Ds Jl De Wagemakerschool (548 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted3 Jul 2026€ 550,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 575,000
Property details
- Living area
- 92 m²
- Plot
- 121 m²
- Construction year
- 1988
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 537,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Luijendijk, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable14%
- Average WOZ value (municipality)ⓘ
- Well above national average€ 670,000
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.6%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby15
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away9.1 km
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated125 persons
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)ⓘ
- Low (bottom quarter)21%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure6
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot areaⓘ
- Spacious plot71 m²
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Above average33%
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space54 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)152 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Strong potential3,756 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield993 kWh/kWp/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
6 permits within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
21st percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 160 pupils
Disadvantage score 6 — more disadvantage than 31% of schools
81st percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 210 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
54th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 14 — more disadvantage than 49% of schools
17th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 192 pupils
Disadvantage score 3 — more disadvantage than 22% of schools
30th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 594 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 254 pupils
Disadvantage score 55 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
2nd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 87 pupils
Disadvantage score 43 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
70th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 206 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
97th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 217 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
46th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 313 pupils
Disadvantage score 60 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
no exam results · PRO
38th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 88 exam candidates
4th percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 111 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
53rd percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 143 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
64th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 90 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.9 · HAVO/VWO · 96 exam candidates
38th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 76 exam candidates
60th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 111 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.