Price drops in and around Maassluis
More homes in and around Maassluis whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
23/07/2026 | Turfkade 34 Brielle | € 569.000 € 555.000 | -2.5% | 145 m²95 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Jacob van Heemskercklaan 13 Maassluis | € 650.000 € 625.000 | -3.9% | 141 m²140 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Maasboulevard 44 B Spijkenisse | € 425.000 € 399.900 | -5.9% | 118 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Dalkruid 2 Vlaardingen | € 459.000 € 439.000 | -4.4% | 103 m²107 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Tollenspark 15 's-Gravenzande | € 770.000 € 750.000 | -2.6% | 156 m²213 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Texasweg 8 Hoogvliet Rotterdam | € 350.000 € 335.000 | -4.3% | 106 m²125 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Aart van der Leeuwlaan 84 Delft | € 370.000 € 360.000 | -2.7% | 104 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Hongerlandsedijk 698 Spijkenisse | € 499.900 € 475.000 | -5.0% | 118 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Kievitstraat 11 Honselersdijk | € 445.000 € 422.500 | -5.1% | 88 m²134 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Ruisvoornpad 51 Hoogvliet Rotterdam | € 574.500 € 549.500 | -4.3% | 158 m²154 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Laningpad 2 Spijkenisse | € 620.000 € 585.000 | -5.7% | 139 m²442 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Dirk Schäferplein 126 Schiedam | € 275.000 € 269.500 | -2.0% | 83 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Ranonkelstraat 153 Spijkenisse | € 475.000 € 425.000 | -10.5% | 118 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Van Innevelthof 21 Maasdijk | € 500.000 € 495.000 | -1.0% | 106 m²150 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Kapellaan 28 Den Hoorn (ZH) | € 498.000 € 485.000 | -2.6% | 100 m²95 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Kemperhof 59 Vlaardingen | € 619.000 € 599.000 | -3.2% | 142 m²126 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Oosterlee 6 De Lier | € 450.000 € 425.000 | -5.6% | 107 m²140 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Molslaan 78 Delft | € 320.000 € 300.000 | -6.3% | 59 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Burgemeester Van Haarenlaan 1324 Schiedam | € 290.000 € 275.000 | -5.2% | 71 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Vrouwenhoflaan 2 b Brielle | € 490.000 € 450.000 | -8.2% | 138 m²196 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Jacob van Heemskercklaan 13
Terraced house at Jacob van Heemskercklaan 13 in Maassluis (Het Balkon neighbourhood). The home was built in 2008 and has 146 m² of living space, a 140 m² plot, 5 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Maassluis West (666 m). The nearest primary school is De Groene Hoek (984 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced23 Jul 2026€ 625,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 650,000
Property details
- Living area
- 146 m²
- Plot
- 140 m²
- Construction year
- 2008
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 5
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- € 566,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Het Balkon, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable21%
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated110 persons
- Obesity (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- High16.3%
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away18 km
- Distance to train stationⓘ
- Far away11.6 km
- Distance to train stationⓘ
- Station very far away13.2 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facilityⓘ
- Very close (<500 m)255 m
- Distance to nearest emission sourceⓘ
- very nearby246 m
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High1.6%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby39
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby7
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Distance to airportⓘ
- Nearby14.1 km
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- Elevated1.8%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- Elevated2%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)ⓘ
- Elevated2.8 µg/kg
- Wind turbines within 3 kmⓘ
- Wind farm in the neighbourhood3
- Distance to nearest asylum reception centreⓘ
- Nearby (<1 km)552 m
- Distance to play area/playgroundⓘ
- Play area right next door79 m
- Distance to business districtⓘ
- Near business park112 m
- Distance to planned asylum accommodationⓘ
- Nearby (<1 km)546 m
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot areaⓘ
- Spacious plot74 m²
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Many solar panels46%
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- Low emissions16 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space85 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)94 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA+
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical380 m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
4 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 24 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
76th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 326 pupils
Disadvantage score 22: more disadvantage than 62% of schools
49th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 189 pupils
Disadvantage score 20: more disadvantage than 59% of schools
6th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 484 pupils
Disadvantage score 100: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
74th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 261 pupils
Disadvantage score 7: more disadvantage than 33% of schools
39th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 499 pupils
Disadvantage score 28: more disadvantage than 69% of schools
11th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 222 pupils
Disadvantage score 25: more disadvantage than 66% of schools
5th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 244 pupils
Disadvantage score 68: more disadvantage than 92% of schools
22nd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 250 pupils
Disadvantage score 17: more disadvantage than 56% of schools
15th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 289 pupils
Disadvantage score 24: more disadvantage than 64% of schools
no recent test score · total 145 pupils
Disadvantage score 6: more disadvantage than 31% of schools
41st percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 71 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
8th percentile: low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 148 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
85th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 31 exam candidates
88th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO · 138 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.