Price drops in and around Alkmaar
More homes in and around Alkmaar whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Korte Landstraat 2
Apartment at Korte Landstraat 2 in Alkmaar (Staatsliedenkwartier en Landstraten neighbourhood). The home was built in 1934 and has 41 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Alkmaar (1.5 km). The nearest primary school is Rooms Katholieke Basisschool St Adelbertus (209 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted24 Jul 2026€ 365,000−€ 24,000
- Listed for sale4 Jun 2026€ 389,000
Property details
- Living area
- 41 m²
- Construction year
- 1934
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 246,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Staatsliedenkwartier en Landstraten, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated165 persons
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share18.4%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)85%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)85%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure55
- Permits <500 m (3 months)
- Very high construction activity16
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby8
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby9
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors43.9%
- Asbestos-suspected roof area
- Large suspected asbestos roof area66.3 m²
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)
- Very high groundwater28 m above sea level
- In area with induced earthquakes
- In earthquake zoneYes
- Severest induced earthquake in the neighbourhood
- Possibly light damage3.5 ML
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Nearby1.9 km
- Distance to wind farm in development
- Wind farm in development within 3 km (indicative location)2.2 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Above-average nuisance7.5%
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)
- Elevated4.5%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated3.3%
- Near waste incinerator/biomass facility
- Within ~5 km of waste incinerator / biomass facilityYes
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.6 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Below the national average50.7%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.3%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.522 µg/m³
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)19.9 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)2.4 km
- Distance to railway line
- Far from rail1.4 km
- Distance to sprayed crop
- Far away (>250 m)1.4 km
- Distance to overhead high-voltage line
- Well away5,353 m
- Distance to nearest external safety facility
- Well away10.6 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
50 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 29 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
80th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 478 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
52nd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 85 pupils · total 623 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
20th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 180 pupils
Disadvantage score 46: more disadvantage than 82% of schools
32nd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 102 pupils
Disadvantage score 29: more disadvantage than 70% of schools
23rd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 300 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
43rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 189 pupils
Disadvantage score 39: more disadvantage than 78% of schools
27th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 70: more disadvantage than 93% of schools
63rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 161 pupils
Disadvantage score 32: more disadvantage than 73% of schools
30th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 374 pupils
Disadvantage score 15: more disadvantage than 52% of schools
71st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 187 pupils
Disadvantage score 19: more disadvantage than 59% of schools
83rd percentile: high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.7 · HAVO/VWO · 216 exam candidates
89th percentile: high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 105 exam candidates
22nd percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VWO · 75 exam candidates
88th percentile: high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 112 exam candidates
88th percentile: high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO · 123 exam candidates
56th percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO · 51 exam candidates
86th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 39 exam candidates
77th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 85 exam candidates
55th percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 116 exam candidates
27th percentile: average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 251 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.