Price drops in and around Amstelveen
More homes in and around Amstelveen whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Lindepark 75
Apartment at Lindepark 75 in Amstelveen (Populierenbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 2014 and has 136 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Amstelveenseweg (4.9 km). The nearest primary school is Het Palet (473 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted9 Jul 2026€ 1,150,000−€ 175,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 1,325,000
Property details
- Living area
- 136 m²
- Construction year
- 2014
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 923,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Populierenbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Well above national average€ 615,000
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High1.8%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away6.8 km
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)83.6%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)85%
- Number of risk sources within 1 km
- Many sources8
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot752 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical710 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values8.3%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.634 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away12.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 18 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
93rd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 24% of schools
68th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 213 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 12% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 187 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
95th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 75 pupils · total 642 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
95th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 416 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
51st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 295 pupils
Disadvantage score 23 — more disadvantage than 62% of schools
46th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 395 pupils
Disadvantage score 6 — more disadvantage than 31% of schools
93rd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 57 pupils · total 413 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
90th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 423 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 27% of schools
66th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 83 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
25th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 298 exam candidates
47th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 327 exam candidates
57th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 262 exam candidates
6th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO · 87 exam candidates
47th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 120 exam candidates
20th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 45 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
92nd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 19 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.