Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Loosduinsekade 571
Apartment at Loosduinsekade 571 in 's-Gravenhage (Leyenburg neighbourhood). The home was built in 1936 and has 87 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label F. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (3 km). The nearest primary school is Katholieke Basisschool De Jonge Wereld (252 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted21 Jul 2026€ 300,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 315,000
Property details
- Living area
- 87 m²
- Construction year
- 1936
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- F
- WOZ value
- € 305,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Leyenburg, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Energy label
- PoorF
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.3%
- Noise load
- Loud68 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive59 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2 °C
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Generous plot268 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical590 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.856 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away42.6 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)47 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
11 permits within 500 m · 20 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 242 pupils
Disadvantage score 41 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
60th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 240 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 233 pupils
Disadvantage score 42 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
35th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 450 pupils
Disadvantage score 77 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
92nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 456 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
37th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 176 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
72nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 187 pupils
Disadvantage score 48 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
41st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 339 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
29th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 234 pupils
Disadvantage score 50 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
7th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 255 pupils
Disadvantage score 41 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
19th percentile — low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 225 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 102 exam candidates
52nd percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 123 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 171 exam candidates
3rd percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · HAVO/VWO · 157 exam candidates
34th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.