Price drops in and around Alphen aan den Rijn
More homes in and around Alphen aan den Rijn whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Lupinesingel 73
Terraced house at Lupinesingel 73 in Alphen aan den Rijn (Ericapark neighbourhood). The home was built in 2017 and has 109 m² of living space, a 111 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Alphen aan den Rijn (2.7 km). The nearest primary school is Protestants Christelijke Basisschool De Stromen (122 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted18 Jun 2026€ 525,000−€ 25,000
- For sale3 Jun 2026
- Off funda26 May 2026€ 550,000
Property details
- Living area
- 109 m²
- Plot
- 111 m²
- Construction year
- 2017
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 508,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Ericapark, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress48 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby13
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby11
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away17.6 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated105 persons
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.134 score
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)84.6%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)79.9%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space75 m²
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,256 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,004 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values12.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
9 permits within 500 m · 22 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
45th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 330 pupils
Disadvantage score 50 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
5th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 288 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
70th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 190 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
27th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 148 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
58th percentile — average · AMN · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 145 pupils
Disadvantage score 25 — more disadvantage than 65% of schools
42nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 335 pupils
Disadvantage score 3 — more disadvantage than 22% of schools
45th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 280 pupils
Disadvantage score 23 — more disadvantage than 63% of schools
98th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 126 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 17% of schools
38th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 194 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
92nd percentile — high · DIA · grade 8: 13 pupils · total 89 pupils
Disadvantage score 33 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
16th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 305 exam candidates
87th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 132 exam candidates
69th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 131 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
80th percentile — high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 279 exam candidates
76th percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO · 129 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
77th percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 185 exam candidates
35th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VWO · 109 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.