Price drops in and around Amstelveen
More homes in and around Amstelveen whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Marshallsingel 33
Semi-detached at Marshallsingel 33 in Amstelveen (Landschappenbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1994 and has 153 m² of living space, a 187 m² plot, 5 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Schiphol Airport (4.9 km). The nearest primary school is Karel Eykman School (405 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced5 Jun 2026€ 830,000−€ 19,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 849,000
Property details
- Living area
- 153 m²
- Plot
- 187 m²
- Construction year
- 1994
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 5
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 783,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Landschappenbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable20%
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Well above national average€ 615,000
- Distance to nearest glasshouse horticulture
- Very close228 m
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport4.7 km
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High1.8%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Glass horticulture area within 1 km
- Very many glasshouses (strong light nuisance)583,692 m²
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Greenhouse area within 1 km
- Large-scale greenhouse horticulture nearby58.39 ha
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot103 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average28%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space93 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)125 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential6,613 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,014 kWh/kWp/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit · 16 construction plans within 500 m · 14 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
85th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 79 pupils · total 486 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
20th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 175 pupils
Disadvantage score 22 — more disadvantage than 62% of schools
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 104 pupils · total 706 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
90th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 423 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 27% of schools
87th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 131 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 6% of schools
61st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 395 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
71st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 184 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 18% of schools
51st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 295 pupils
Disadvantage score 23 — more disadvantage than 62% of schools
93rd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 57 pupils · total 413 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
46th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 395 pupils
Disadvantage score 6 — more disadvantage than 31% of schools
25th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 298 exam candidates
47th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 327 exam candidates
57th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 262 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
59th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO · 112 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 271 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
21st percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 164 exam candidates
63rd percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 115 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.