Price drops in and around Groningen
More homes in and around Groningen whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Marsstraat 12
Terraced house at Marsstraat 12 in Groningen (Paddepoel-Noord neighbourhood). The home was built in 1971 and has 130 m² of living space, a 115 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Groningen Noord (1.3 km). The nearest primary school is Katholieke Daltonschool Bisschop Bekkers (384 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted24 Jul 2026€ 369,000−€ 6,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 375,000
Property details
- Living area
- 130 m²
- Plot
- 115 m²
- Construction year
- 1971
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 387,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Paddepoel-Noord, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Share of households lowest 40% income
- strong concentration of low incomes72.8%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated95 persons
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.1024 score
- Net labour participation
- Low55%
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place1.78 ratio
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)19%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)82%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)80.8%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure11
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside40%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors40.3%
- Distance to nearest induced earthquake
- Earthquake very nearby0.1 km
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)
- Very high groundwater34 m above sea level
- In area with induced earthquakes
- In earthquake zoneYes
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Severest induced earthquake in the neighbourhood
- Possibly light damage2.8 ML
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Number of soil surveys
- Soil survey registered1
- Distance to airport
- Nearby12.9 km
- Distance to wind farm in development
- Wind farm in development within 3 km (indicative location)2.5 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Above-average nuisance7.7%
- Estimated sun hours (winter)
- Virtually no winter sun0.5 hour
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- Elevated1.9%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Multiple industrial businesses5
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space80 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical650 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,325 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Good yield955 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.5%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.429 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away31.2 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)31.1 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
11 permits within 500 m · 4 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
19th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 140 pupils
Disadvantage score 40: more disadvantage than 79% of schools
17th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 288 pupils
Disadvantage score 121: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
76th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 240 pupils
Disadvantage score 86: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
60th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 63 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
16th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 197 pupils
Disadvantage score 64: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
48th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 200 pupils
Disadvantage score 54: more disadvantage than 86% of schools
95th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 306 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
84th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 379 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
42nd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 413 pupils
Disadvantage score 2: more disadvantage than 19% of schools
98th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 317 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
24th percentile: low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 258 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
79th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 85 exam candidates
39th percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 244 exam candidates
27th percentile: average · 84% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VWO · 118 exam candidates
no exam results · VWO
16th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 262 exam candidates
44th percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 125 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.