Price drops in and around Maassluis
More homes in and around Maassluis whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
23/07/2026 | Onderling 43 Maassluis | € 599.000 € 579.000 | -3.3% | 121 m²99 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Turfkade 34 Brielle | € 569.000 € 555.000 | -2.5% | 145 m²95 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Jacob van Heemskercklaan 13 Maassluis | € 650.000 € 625.000 | -3.9% | 141 m²140 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Maasboulevard 44 B Spijkenisse | € 425.000 € 399.900 | -5.9% | 118 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Dalkruid 2 Vlaardingen | € 459.000 € 439.000 | -4.4% | 103 m²107 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Tollenspark 15 's-Gravenzande | € 770.000 € 750.000 | -2.6% | 156 m²213 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Texasweg 8 Hoogvliet Rotterdam | € 350.000 € 335.000 | -4.3% | 106 m²125 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Aart van der Leeuwlaan 84 Delft | € 370.000 € 360.000 | -2.7% | 104 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Hongerlandsedijk 698 Spijkenisse | € 499.900 € 475.000 | -5.0% | 118 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Kievitstraat 11 Honselersdijk | € 445.000 € 422.500 | -5.1% | 88 m²134 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Ruisvoornpad 51 Hoogvliet Rotterdam | € 574.500 € 549.500 | -4.3% | 158 m²154 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Laningpad 2 Spijkenisse | € 620.000 € 585.000 | -5.7% | 139 m²442 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Dirk Schäferplein 126 Schiedam | € 275.000 € 269.500 | -2.0% | 83 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Ranonkelstraat 153 Spijkenisse | € 475.000 € 425.000 | -10.5% | 118 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Van Innevelthof 21 Maasdijk | € 500.000 € 495.000 | -1.0% | 106 m²150 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Kapellaan 28 Den Hoorn (ZH) | € 498.000 € 485.000 | -2.6% | 100 m²95 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Kemperhof 59 Vlaardingen | € 619.000 € 599.000 | -3.2% | 142 m²126 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Oosterlee 6 De Lier | € 450.000 € 425.000 | -5.6% | 107 m²140 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Molslaan 78 Delft | € 320.000 € 300.000 | -6.3% | 59 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Burgemeester Van Haarenlaan 1324 Schiedam | € 290.000 € 275.000 | -5.2% | 71 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Onderling 43
Terraced house at Onderling 43 in Maassluis (Wilgenrijk neighbourhood). The home was built in 2020 and has 119 m² of living space, a 99 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Maassluis West (1.2 km). The nearest primary school is IKC De Regenboog (666 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted23 Jul 2026€ 579,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 599,000
Property details
- Living area
- 119 m²
- Plot
- 99 m²
- Construction year
- 2020
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 527,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Wilgenrijk, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated140 persons
- Number of building plans within 500 mⓘ
- Much building activity56
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away18.8 km
- Distance to train stationⓘ
- Far away10.4 km
- Distance to train stationⓘ
- Station very far away14.1 km
- General practitioners within 1 kmⓘ
- No GP within 1 km0
- Buildings under construction in the neighbourhoodⓘ
- intensive building activity71 buildings
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High1.6%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Glass horticulture area within 1 kmⓘ
- Very many glasshouses (strong light nuisance)232,233 m²
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby17
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Greenhouse area within 1 kmⓘ
- Large-scale greenhouse horticulture nearby23.22 ha
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)ⓘ
- Very high groundwater23 m above sea level
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)ⓘ
- Very deep (above 2 m)2.3 m
- Flood risk classⓘ
- High flood risklarge
- Distance to military terrainⓘ
- Near military site2 km
- Distance to airportⓘ
- Nearby13.5 km
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- Elevated1.8%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- Elevated2%
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Multiple sources3
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)ⓘ
- Elevated2.8 µg/kg
- Distance to indoor swimming poolⓘ
- Further away3.8 km
- GPs within 3 kmⓘ
- Few GPs nearby4
- Childcare facilities within 1 kmⓘ
- Limited childcare nearby0.7
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential arearesidential area
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Many solar panels79%
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space63 m²
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical390 m³
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Strong potential4,552 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield1,040 kWh/kWp/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits · 56 construction plans within 500 m · 12 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
74th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 261 pupils
Disadvantage score 7: more disadvantage than 33% of schools
49th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 189 pupils
Disadvantage score 20: more disadvantage than 59% of schools
no recent test score · total 145 pupils
Disadvantage score 6: more disadvantage than 31% of schools
22nd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 250 pupils
Disadvantage score 17: more disadvantage than 56% of schools
6th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 484 pupils
Disadvantage score 100: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
15th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 289 pupils
Disadvantage score 24: more disadvantage than 64% of schools
76th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 326 pupils
Disadvantage score 22: more disadvantage than 62% of schools
77th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 459 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
91st percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 13 pupils · total 134 pupils
Disadvantage score 8: more disadvantage than 37% of schools
39th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 499 pupils
Disadvantage score 28: more disadvantage than 69% of schools
41st percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 71 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
8th percentile: low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 148 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
88th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO · 138 exam candidates
85th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 31 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.