Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Ottho Heldringstraat 27 U
Apartment at Ottho Heldringstraat 27 in Amsterdam (Staalmanbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 2010 and has 143 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Henk Sneevlietweg (273 m). The nearest primary school is Einsteinschool (145 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted24 Jul 2026€ 750,000−€ 45,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 795,000
Property details
- Living area
- 143 m²
- Construction year
- 2010
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- € 859,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Staalmanbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated205 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1582 score
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental62%
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)12%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)79.1%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)79%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure6
- Distance to railway line
- Very close to railway55 m
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.2%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside38.8%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors38.9%
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)
- Very high groundwater19 m above sea level
- Groundwater table (Gt)
- Very wet (high groundwater level)IIa
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)0.91 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Above national average€ 575,000
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Nearby (0.5-1 km)670 m
- Distance to airport
- Nearby6.5 km
- Serious noise nuisance from trains (neighbourhood)
- Heavy train noise2.9%
- Noise load
- Heavy62 dB
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.5%
- Environmental health risk (MGR)
- Elevated6.6%
- Under flight path / in aviation noise zone
- In air traffic noise zoneYes
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Leasehold or freehold
- FreeholdNo
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot13,862 m²
- Share of renewable energy
- High share of renewable energy82%
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average33%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions4 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)17 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical130 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
6 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 39 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
12th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 73 pupils
Disadvantage score 23: more disadvantage than 63% of schools
47th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 332 pupils
Disadvantage score 52: more disadvantage than 86% of schools
74th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 90 pupils
Disadvantage score 12: more disadvantage than 48% of schools
8th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 299 pupils
Disadvantage score 2: more disadvantage than 16% of schools
71st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 250 pupils
Disadvantage score 6: more disadvantage than 31% of schools
87th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 71 pupils · total 533 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
3rd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 203 pupils
Disadvantage score 46: more disadvantage than 83% of schools
51st percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 403 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
6th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 292 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 89% of schools
34th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 489 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
1st percentile: low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 231 exam candidates
66th percentile: average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 68 exam candidates
72nd percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO · 38 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
5th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
56th percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
3rd percentile: low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 299 exam candidates
0th percentile: low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.