Price drops in and around Helmond
More homes in and around Helmond whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Paulus Potterlaan 27
Terraced house at Paulus Potterlaan 27 in Helmond (Bloemvelden neighbourhood). The home was built in 1964 and has 115 m² of living space, a 182 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Helmond (2.1 km). The nearest primary school is Kindcentrum Mozaïek (336 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted27 Jul 2026€ 344,500−€ 500
- Price reduced16 Jun 2026€ 345,000−€ 14,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 359,000
Property details
- Living area
- 115 m²
- Plot
- 182 m²
- Construction year
- 1964
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 335,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Bloemvelden, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Liveability class
- Weakweak
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.2069 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1017 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share24.5%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High22%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental63%
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place1.79 ratio
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)23%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)78%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)68%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.8%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High3.9%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.2%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby27
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside39.5%
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)
- Very high groundwater26 m above sea level
- Number of soil surveys
- Soil survey registered1
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.7%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- Elevated1.1%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- High heat stress41 °C
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Multiple sources3
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.1 °C
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Below the national average46.4%
- Masts within 300 m
- Multiple transmission masts4
- Share of social assistance recipients
- Elevated5.8%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot105 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space78 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,449 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,002 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values13.6%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits · 4 construction plans within 500 m · 27 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
23rd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 381 pupils
Disadvantage score 103: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
26th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 188 pupils
Disadvantage score 41: more disadvantage than 80% of schools
6th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 336 pupils
Disadvantage score 67: more disadvantage than 92% of schools
6th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 323 pupils
Disadvantage score 34: more disadvantage than 75% of schools
80th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 202 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
20th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 61 pupils · total 383 pupils
Disadvantage score 87: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
66th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 408 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
32nd percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 300 pupils
Disadvantage score 75: more disadvantage than 94% of schools
11th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 360 pupils
Disadvantage score 58: more disadvantage than 89% of schools
52nd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 437 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no exam results · PRO
53rd percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 282 exam candidates
78th percentile: high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 124 exam candidates
31st percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 139 exam candidates
25th percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 71 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.