Price drops in and around Voorburg
More homes in and around Voorburg whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Leuvensestraat 79 A Den Haag | € 789.000 € 749.000 | -5.1% | 110 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Prinses Mariannelaan 288 A Voorburg | € 500.000 € 489.000 | -2.2% | 137 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Hollanderstraat 36 Den Haag | € 775.000 € 715.000 | -7.7% | 122 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Manderhof 15 Bergschenhoek | € 500.000 € 490.000 | -2.0% | 101 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Filmlaan 1 Zoetermeer | € 485.000 € 475.000 | -2.1% | 115 m²129 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Zeekant 94 G Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 72 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | van Halewijnlaan 4 A Voorburg | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Else Mauhslaan 137 Den Haag | € 625.000 € 610.000 | -2.4% | 143 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Tulpstraat 20 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 275.000 € 250.000 | -9.1% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Van Lennepweg 50 Den Haag | € 850.000 € 797.500 | -6.2% | 170 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Margarethaland 269 Den Haag | € 385.000 € 362.500 | -5.8% | 87 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Dr H. Colijnlaan 6 F102 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 295.000 € 240.000 | -18.6% | 96 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Klimopstraat 77 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 550.000 | -7.6% | 111 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Windjammersingel 34 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 575.000 | -3.4% | 154 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Breestraat 123 B Leiden | € 699.000 € 625.000 | -10.6% | 109 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Leidsekade 42 Leidschendam | € 1.000.000 € 998.000 | -0.2% | 138 m²130 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Overgauwseweg 75 Pijnacker | € 1.200.000 € 1.075.000 | -10.4% | 170 m²1325 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Molslaan 78 Delft | € 320.000 € 300.000 | -6.3% | 59 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Pyrolalaan 96 Den Haag | € 1.250.000 € 1.185.000 | -5.2% | 153 m²230 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Zwolsestraat 219 Den Haag | € 524.000 € 495.000 | -5.5% | 139 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Prins Bernhardlaan 66
Apartment at Prins Bernhardlaan 66 in Voorburg (Voorburg Midden zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1951 and has 105 m² of living space, 4 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Voorburg (625 m). The nearest primary school is Basisschool De Lusthof (420 m).
Price & status history
- Under offer17 Jun 2026
- Relisted5 Jun 2026€ 439,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 449,000
Property details
- Living area
- 105 m²
- Construction year
- 1951
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 458,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Voorburg Midden zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby8
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby11
- Traffic on your own streetⓘ
- Very busy (main/motorway)11,250 per day
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated150 persons
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)87.6%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure14
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)ⓘ
- Very high groundwater19 m above sea level
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values8.4%
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.865 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away38.5 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)45.1 km
- Distance to nearest emission sourceⓘ
- ample distance1 km
- Distance to sprayed cropⓘ
- Far away (>250 m)846 m
- Distance to overhead high-voltage lineⓘ
- Well away1,269 m
- Distance to nearest high-voltage power lineⓘ
- Far from high voltage527 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
13 permits within 500 m · 27 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
93rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 86 pupils · total 625 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
46th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 414 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
88th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 250 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
32nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 503 pupils
Disadvantage score 83 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
90th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 344 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
44th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 180 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 72% of schools
92nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 337 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
91st percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 285 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
77th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 455 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no recent test score · total 62 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 7% of schools
72nd percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 109 exam candidates
68th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 233 exam candidates
98th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 59 exam candidates
71st percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 84 exam candidates
23rd percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 187 exam candidates
48th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 110 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · PRO
95th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 71 exam candidates
12th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 79 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.