Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | De Genestetlaan 256 Den Haag | € 387.500 € 375.000 | -3.2% | 135 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Hammarskjöldlaan 467 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 15.000 € 13.500 | -10.0% | — | |||
20/07/2026 | Agrippinastraat 17 Voorburg | € 695.000 € 669.000 | -3.7% | 109 m²106 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | C.T. Storklaan 583 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 789.000 € 779.000 | -1.3% | 120 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Kapellaan 28 Den Hoorn (ZH) | € 498.000 € 485.000 | -2.6% | 100 m²95 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Stoeplaan 11 F24 Wassenaar | € 875.000 € 840.000 | -4.0% | 150 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Leuvensestraat 79 A Den Haag | € 789.000 € 749.000 | -5.1% | 110 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Prinses Mariannelaan 288 A Voorburg | € 500.000 € 489.000 | -2.2% | 137 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Hollanderstraat 36 Den Haag | € 775.000 € 715.000 | -7.7% | 122 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Zeekant 94 G Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 72 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | van Halewijnlaan 4 A Voorburg | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Else Mauhslaan 137 Den Haag | € 625.000 € 610.000 | -2.4% | 143 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Tulpstraat 20 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 275.000 € 250.000 | -9.1% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Van Lennepweg 50 Den Haag | € 850.000 € 797.500 | -6.2% | 170 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Margarethaland 269 Den Haag | € 385.000 € 362.500 | -5.8% | 87 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Dr H. Colijnlaan 6 F102 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 295.000 € 240.000 | -18.6% | 96 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Klimopstraat 77 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 550.000 | -7.6% | 111 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Windjammersingel 34 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 575.000 | -3.4% | 154 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Leidsekade 42 Leidschendam | € 1.000.000 € 998.000 | -0.2% | 138 m²130 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Overgauwseweg 75 Pijnacker | € 1.200.000 € 1.075.000 | -10.4% | 170 m²1325 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Leuvensestraat 79 A
Semi-detached at Leuvensestraat 79 in 's-Gravenhage (Belgisch Park neighbourhood). The home was built in 1914 and has 106 m² of living space, a 165 m² plot, 1 bedroom and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Centraal Station (3.7 km). The nearest primary school is Protestants Christelijke Basisschool Willem de Zwijger (124 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced20 Jul 2026€ 749,000−€ 40,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 789,000
Property details
- Living area
- 106 m²
- Plot
- 165 m²
- Construction year
- 1914
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 485,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Belgisch Park, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated120 persons
- Children per primary school place (proxy)ⓘ
- Many children per place3.45 ratio
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure35
- Permits <500 m (3 months)ⓘ
- Very high construction activity13
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot areaⓘ
- Spacious plot62 m²
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space143 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)172 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalB
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Very high potential10,442 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield1,046 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
36 permits within 500 m · 9 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
93rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 57 pupils · total 445 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
72nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 69 pupils · total 566 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
35th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 150 pupils
Disadvantage score 61 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
68th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 464 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
87th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 296 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
92nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 215 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile — high · DOE · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 432 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
77th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 100 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 213 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 231 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
24th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
34th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 142 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 116 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
45th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 22 exam candidates
20th percentile — low · 90% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 52 exam candidates
99th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 114 exam candidates
61st percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 175 exam candidates
22nd percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 225 exam candidates
61st percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 69 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.