Price drops in and around Leidschendam
More homes in and around Leidschendam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Leidsekade 42
Terraced house at Leidsekade 42 in Leidschendam (Leidschendam - Zuid De Tol / 't Hert neighbourhood). The home was built in 2007 and has 168 m² of living space, a 130 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Forepark (1.4 km). The nearest primary school is MMiXX (134 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted17 Jul 2026€ 998,000−€ 2,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 1,000,000
Property details
- Living area
- 168 m²
- Plot
- 130 m²
- Construction year
- 2007
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 778,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Leidschendam - Zuid De Tol / 't Hert, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental57%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away7.4 km
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share19.8%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High18.8%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)84%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)81.3%
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)
- Very high groundwater22 m above sea level
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot53 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space55 m²
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential3,946 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,024 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values8.4%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
10 permits within 500 m · 10 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
40th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 218 pupils
Disadvantage score 43 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
54th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 214 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 25% of schools
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 250 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
78th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 258 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
67th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 68 pupils · total 556 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
23rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 218 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 49% of schools
67th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 86 pupils · total 673 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 173 pupils
Disadvantage score 53 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
4th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 207 pupils
Disadvantage score 66 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
20th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 180 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 4% of schools
60th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 123 exam candidates
60th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 69 exam candidates
61st percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 146 exam candidates
no exam results · VWO
84th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 65 exam candidates
23rd percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 187 exam candidates
48th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 110 exam candidates
71st percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 84 exam candidates
93rd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 50 exam candidates
98th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 59 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.