Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Leuvensestraat 79 A Den Haag | € 789.000 € 749.000 | -5.1% | 110 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Prinses Mariannelaan 288 A Voorburg | € 500.000 € 489.000 | -2.2% | 137 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Hollanderstraat 36 Den Haag | € 775.000 € 715.000 | -7.7% | 122 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Zeekant 94 G Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 72 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | van Halewijnlaan 4 A Voorburg | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Else Mauhslaan 137 Den Haag | € 625.000 € 610.000 | -2.4% | 143 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Tulpstraat 20 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 275.000 € 250.000 | -9.1% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Van Lennepweg 50 Den Haag | € 850.000 € 797.500 | -6.2% | 170 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Margarethaland 269 Den Haag | € 385.000 € 362.500 | -5.8% | 87 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Dr H. Colijnlaan 6 F102 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 295.000 € 240.000 | -18.6% | 96 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Klimopstraat 77 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 550.000 | -7.6% | 111 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Windjammersingel 34 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 575.000 | -3.4% | 154 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Leidsekade 42 Leidschendam | € 1.000.000 € 998.000 | -0.2% | 138 m²130 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Overgauwseweg 75 Pijnacker | € 1.200.000 € 1.075.000 | -10.4% | 170 m²1325 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Molslaan 78 Delft | € 320.000 € 300.000 | -6.3% | 59 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Pyrolalaan 96 Den Haag | € 1.250.000 € 1.185.000 | -5.2% | 153 m²230 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Zwolsestraat 219 Den Haag | € 524.000 € 495.000 | -5.5% | 139 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Burgemeester Marijnenlaan 102 Den Haag | € 1.250.000 € 1.200.000 | -4.0% | 157 m²156 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Van Zeggelenlaan 12 Den Haag | € 300.000 € 299.000 | -0.3% | 85 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Korenlaan 3 Wassenaar | € 665.000 € 625.000 | -6.0% | 113 m²135 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Windjammersingel 34
Apartment at Windjammersingel 34 in 's-Gravenhage (De Venen neighbourhood). The home was built in 2013 and has 148 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Ypenburg (318 m). The nearest primary school is Openbare Basisschool De Notenkraker (520 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced17 Jul 2026€ 575,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 595,000
Property details
- Living area
- 148 m²
- Construction year
- 2013
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 515,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in De Venen, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby10
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Masts within 300 mⓘ
- Many transmission masts nearby7
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhoodⓘ
- Predominantly social rental56%
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away7.7 km
- General practitioners within 1 kmⓘ
- No GP within 1 km0
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Very generous plot8,235 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical40 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.868 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away35.7 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)42.6 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
7 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 28 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
93rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
65th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 270 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 45% of schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 307 pupils
Disadvantage score 18 — more disadvantage than 57% of schools
82nd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 387 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
74th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 60 pupils · total 461 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
77th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 268 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 14% of schools
75th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 343 pupils
Disadvantage score 19 — more disadvantage than 58% of schools
82nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 86 pupils · total 588 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
85th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 110 pupils
Disadvantage score 25 — more disadvantage than 65% of schools
32nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 460 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 48% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
50th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 237 exam candidates
no exam results · VWO
84th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 65 exam candidates
61st percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 146 exam candidates
48th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 110 exam candidates
44th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 227 exam candidates
23rd percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 187 exam candidates
72nd percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 109 exam candidates
68th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 233 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.