Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | De Genestetlaan 256 Den Haag | € 387.500 € 375.000 | -3.2% | 135 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Hammarskjöldlaan 467 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 15.000 € 13.500 | -10.0% | — | |||
20/07/2026 | Agrippinastraat 17 Voorburg | € 695.000 € 669.000 | -3.7% | 109 m²106 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | C.T. Storklaan 583 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 789.000 € 779.000 | -1.3% | 120 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Kapellaan 28 Den Hoorn (ZH) | € 498.000 € 485.000 | -2.6% | 100 m²95 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Stoeplaan 11 F24 Wassenaar | € 875.000 € 840.000 | -4.0% | 150 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Leuvensestraat 79 A Den Haag | € 789.000 € 749.000 | -5.1% | 110 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Prinses Mariannelaan 288 A Voorburg | € 500.000 € 489.000 | -2.2% | 137 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Hollanderstraat 36 Den Haag | € 775.000 € 715.000 | -7.7% | 122 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Zeekant 94 G Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 72 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | van Halewijnlaan 4 A Voorburg | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Else Mauhslaan 137 Den Haag | € 625.000 € 610.000 | -2.4% | 143 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Tulpstraat 20 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 275.000 € 250.000 | -9.1% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Van Lennepweg 50 Den Haag | € 850.000 € 797.500 | -6.2% | 170 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Margarethaland 269 Den Haag | € 385.000 € 362.500 | -5.8% | 87 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Dr H. Colijnlaan 6 F102 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 295.000 € 240.000 | -18.6% | 96 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Klimopstraat 77 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 550.000 | -7.6% | 111 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Windjammersingel 34 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 575.000 | -3.4% | 154 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Leidsekade 42 Leidschendam | € 1.000.000 € 998.000 | -0.2% | 138 m²130 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Overgauwseweg 75 Pijnacker | € 1.200.000 € 1.075.000 | -10.4% | 170 m²1325 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Hollanderstraat 36
Terraced house at Hollanderstraat 36 in 's-Gravenhage (Sweelinckplein e.o. neighbourhood). The home was built in 1906 and has 122 m² of living space, a 125 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Grote Markt (2.1 km). The nearest primary school is Da Costa School Christelijke Basisonderwijs (17 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted20 Jul 2026€ 715,000−€ 60,000
- Listed for sale26 Jun 2026€ 775,000
Property details
- Living area
- 122 m²
- Plot
- 125 m²
- Construction year
- 1906
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 650,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Sweelinckplein e.o., compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Strong heat island1.9 °C
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated215 persons
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure49
- Permits <500 m (3 months)ⓘ
- Very high construction activity19
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)ⓘ
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.62 m
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space98 m²
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Very high potential7,173 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield1,043 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.84 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away43.2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
51 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 16 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
89th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 413 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 401 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
95th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 227 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
88th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 458 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 166 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 47% of schools
99th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 236 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 273 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 231 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
87th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 164 pupils
Disadvantage score 56 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
no exam results · PRO
77th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 87 exam candidates
99th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 114 exam candidates
9th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 116 exam candidates
93rd percentile — high · 91% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 115 exam candidates
34th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
28th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 103 exam candidates
20th percentile — low · 90% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 52 exam candidates
45th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 22 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.