Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Rietveld Schröderpad 15
Apartment at Rietveld Schröderpad 15 in Amsterdam (Oostoever Sloterplas neighbourhood). The home was built in 1998 and has 81 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Postjesweg (143 m). The nearest primary school is DENISE (404 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted21 Jul 2026€ 562,500−€ 16,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 578,500
Property details
- Living area
- 81 m²
- Construction year
- 1998
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 512,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property subject to leasehold (leasehold end date: 30-09-2045)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Oostoever Sloterplas, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby17
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated210 persons
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)15%
- Ground subsidence (estimated, mm/year)
- Significant ground subsidence-12.7 mm/yr
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,114 m²
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average29%
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)176 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.67 µg/m³
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)4.8 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
4 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 42 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
15th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 338 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
6th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 292 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
59th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 64 pupils · total 667 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
3rd percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 161 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
22nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 65 pupils · total 471 pupils
Disadvantage score 16 — more disadvantage than 53% of schools
34th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 489 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
3rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 203 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
34th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 208 pupils
Disadvantage score 22 — more disadvantage than 62% of schools
2nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 199 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
70th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 464 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
66th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 68 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 52% passed · CE avg 5.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.