Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Rozengracht 51 C
Apartment at Rozengracht 51 in Amsterdam (Elandsgrachtbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1992 and has 60 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Rokin (832 m). The nearest primary school is Openbare Basisschool Jordaan (332 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted15 Jul 2026€ 500,000−€ 50,000
- Listed for sale19 Jun 2026€ 550,000
Property details
- Living area
- 60 m²
- Construction year
- 1992
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 573,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Elandsgrachtbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.2%
- Noise load
- Loud67 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive59 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby23
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Environmental health risk (MGR)
- High environmental health risk8.1%
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)160 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical690 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.653 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away6.7 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)4.1 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Well away (>2 km)2.3 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)4.3 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
88 permits within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 348 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
79th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 407 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
71st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 346 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
21st percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 183 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 14% of schools
89th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 359 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
72nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 318 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 33% of schools
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 113 pupils
Disadvantage score 24 — more disadvantage than 64% of schools
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 152 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 0% of schools
68th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 169 pupils
Disadvantage score 25 — more disadvantage than 65% of schools
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 435 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
1st percentile — low · 67% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 102 exam candidates
19th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 70 exam candidates
10th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 94 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
91st percentile — high · 92% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 109 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 59 exam candidates
7th percentile — low · 80% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 362 exam candidates
29th percentile — average · 85% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
60th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 111 exam candidates
15th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 196 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.