Price drops in and around Heerlen
More homes in and around Heerlen whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Schaesbergerweg 172
Terraced house at Schaesbergerweg 172 in Heerlen (Schaesbergerveld neighbourhood). The home was built in 1935 and has 185 m² of living space, a 220 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label G. The nearest railway station is Heerlen (1.4 km). The nearest primary school is OBS de Droomboom (407 m).
Price & status history
- Under offer15 Jul 2026
- Relisted30 Jun 2026€ 225,000−€ 20,000
- Relisted6 Jun 2026€ 245,000−€ 30,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 275,000
Property details
- Living area
- 185 m²
- Plot
- 220 m²
- Construction year
- 1935
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- G
- WOZ value
- € 327,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Schaesbergerveld, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Poor (label F/G)387 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- PoorG
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.2%
- Noise load
- Loud67 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive58 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.2%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High4.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.5%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot72 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average29%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space128 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential9,070 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,014 kWh/kWp/yr
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Far below national average€ 238,000
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.2%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
20 zoning plan amendments within 5 km.
Schools
60th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 274 pupils
Disadvantage score 94 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
46th percentile — average · DOE · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 276 pupils
Disadvantage score 61 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
14th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 353 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 5% of schools
40th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 167 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
42nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 423 pupils
Disadvantage score 8 — more disadvantage than 36% of schools
100th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 241 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
64th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 240 pupils
Disadvantage score 35 — more disadvantage than 76% of schools
91st percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 415 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
92nd percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 125 pupils
Disadvantage score 30 — more disadvantage than 71% of schools
65th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 409 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
99th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VBO · 19 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO
100th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 7.1 · VBO · 33 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
15th percentile — low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 119 exam candidates
21st percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VWO · 62 exam candidates
19th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO · 49 exam candidates
94th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 107 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 102 exam candidates
41st percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.