Price drops in and around Lelystad
More homes in and around Lelystad whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Schipbeek 3
Terraced house at Schipbeek 3 in Lelystad (IJssellaan neighbourhood). The home was built in 1972 and has 113 m² of living space, a 139 m² plot, 5 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Lelystad Centrum (2.2 km). The nearest primary school is De Vuurtoren (453 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced31 Jul 2026€ 399,000−€ 46,000
- Listed for sale15 Jul 2026€ 445,000
Property details
- Living area
- 113 m²
- Plot
- 139 m²
- Construction year
- 1972
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 5
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 313,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in IJssellaan, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.1449 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share19.3%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High20.5%
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)8%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)82.8%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)83.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Ground subsidence (estimated, mm/year)
- Significant ground subsidence-15.6 mm/yr
- Foundation risk
- High risklarge
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Very deep (above 2 m)2.33 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Distance to airport
- Nearby7.7 km
- Distance to wind farm in development
- Wind farm in development within 3 km (indicative location)1.4 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Above-average nuisance7.6%
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.2%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated3.5%
- Near waste incinerator/biomass facility
- Within ~5 km of waste incinerator / biomass facilityYes
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Below the national average52.6%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Below the national average54.4%
- Wind farms in development within 3 km
- Wind farm(s) in development in the region (indicative location)1
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential arearesidential area
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot77 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Many solar panels46%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space47 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)174 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential3,825 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,023 kWh/kWp/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits within 500 m · 5 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
8th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 235 pupils
Disadvantage score 79: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
34th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 93 pupils
Disadvantage score 37: more disadvantage than 77% of schools
12th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 149 pupils
Disadvantage score 64: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
32nd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 13 pupils · total 103 pupils
Disadvantage score 5: more disadvantage than 28% of schools
11th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 183 pupils
Disadvantage score 23: more disadvantage than 63% of schools
7th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 158 pupils
Disadvantage score 38: more disadvantage than 77% of schools
71st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 4: more disadvantage than 24% of schools
2nd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 38: more disadvantage than 78% of schools
24th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 225 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
12th percentile: low · DIA · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 191 pupils
Disadvantage score 23: more disadvantage than 63% of schools
no exam results · PRO
2nd percentile: low · 71% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO · 122 exam candidates
11th percentile: low · 80% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 259 exam candidates
4th percentile: low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 233 exam candidates
42nd percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 195 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.