Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Trouringhstraat 28 2
Apartment at Trouringhstraat 28 in Amsterdam (Bosleeuw neighbourhood). The home was built in 1940 and has 47 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is De Vlugtlaan (653 m). The nearest primary school is Tijl Uilenspiegel (188 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted10 Jun 2026€ 400,000−€ 25,000
- Under offer2 Jun 2026€ 425,000
Property details
- Living area
- 47 m²
- Construction year
- 1940
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 477,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold (leasehold end date: 31-08-2064)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Bosleeuw, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance10%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby31
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside36.7%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors31.7%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated230 persons
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Generous plot268 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical570 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.675 µg/m³
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.2 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)2.8 km
- Distance to nearest transmission mast
- No transmitter mast in the neighbourhood306 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
28 permits · 4 construction plans within 500 m · 44 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 245 pupils
Disadvantage score 65 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
no recent test score · total 38 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 24% of schools
56th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 110 pupils
Disadvantage score 22 — more disadvantage than 62% of schools
51st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 161 pupils
Disadvantage score 41 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 295 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 414 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 363 pupils
Disadvantage score 43 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
37th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
14th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 48 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
75th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 272 pupils
Disadvantage score 15 — more disadvantage than 52% of schools
0th percentile — low · 52% passed · CE avg 5.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
10th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 94 exam candidates
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 61% passed · CE avg 5.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 89 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 67% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 102 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
43rd percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 35 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.