Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Van Baerlestraat 1 3A
Apartment at Van Baerlestraat 1 in Amsterdam (P.C. Hooftbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1953 and has 278 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Vijzelgracht (942 m). The nearest primary school is Cornelis Vrijschool voor Basisonderwijs (173 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted24 Jul 2026€ 800,000−€ 50,000
- Listed for sale13 Jun 2026€ 850,000
Property details
- Living area
- 278 m²
- Construction year
- 1953
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 956,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in P.C. Hooftbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1251 score
- Hospitality within 25 m
- Hospitality within 25 m2
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime704.3 per 1,000 residents
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)86.8%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure106
- Permits <500 m (3 months)
- Very high construction activity22
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.5%
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive57 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Environmental health risk (MGR)
- High environmental health risk7.9%
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.1 °C
- Foundation risk
- High risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels2%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Elevated emissions54 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Inefficient (label E)291 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- UneconomicalE
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Above national average€ 575,000
- Distance to airport
- Nearby9.6 km
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10.5 µg/m³
- Noise load
- Heavy65 dB
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.5%
- Leasehold or freehold
- FreeholdNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.666 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away7.3 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)5.4 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Well away (>2 km)2.8 km
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.7 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)5.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
100 permits · 4 construction plans within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
86th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 241 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
69th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 147 pupils
Disadvantage score 2: more disadvantage than 17% of schools
100th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 234 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
92nd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 360 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
21st percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 183 pupils
Disadvantage score 1: more disadvantage than 14% of schools
91st percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 227 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
56th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 266 pupils
Disadvantage score 30: more disadvantage than 71% of schools
100th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 400 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
95th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 405 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
95th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 299 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
91st percentile: high · 92% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 109 exam candidates
18th percentile: low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
5th percentile: low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 59 exam candidates
7th percentile: low · 80% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 362 exam candidates
15th percentile: low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 196 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
99th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.1 · VWO · 105 exam candidates
48th percentile: average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 74 exam candidates
16th percentile: low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 173 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.