Price drops in and around Grootebroek
More homes in and around Grootebroek whose asking price was recently cut.
Over the past 30 days we tracked 24 price cuts in and around Grootebroek, averaging −5.4%. The biggest cut was € 100.000 (Wijzenddijkje 1, Westwoud). Last updated 16 September.
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
For sale-8.0%
For sale-10.9%
For sale-9.5%
For sale-6.5%
For sale-2.0%
For sale-2.3%
For sale-8.3%
For sale-6.1%
For sale-4.5%
For sale-2.0%
For sale-3.4%
For sale-8.5%
For sale-5.4%
For sale-5.6%
For sale-3.1%
For sale-5.4%
For sale-3.9%
Off Funda-4.3%
For sale-8.3%
For sale-7.8%
For sale-6.1%
For sale-3.3%
For sale-1.5%
Huisverklikker Chrome extensionIndicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
Zesstedenweg 205 b
Apartment at Zesstedenweg 205 in Grootebroek (Oud Grootebroek neighbourhood). The home was built in 1930 and has 35 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Bovenkarspel-Grootebroek (1.3 km). The nearest primary school is Uilenburcht (185 m).
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)28 Aug 2026
- Relisted29 Jul 2026€ 199,000−€ 26,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 225,000
At a glance
Click a card for the explanation and source.
- 33.8% With children+2.3 pt vs the Netherlands
- 33.8% Single-person−6.3 pt vs the Netherlands
- 32.4% Other multi-person+4 pt vs the Netherlands
- 84% Owner-occupied+27 pt vs the Netherlands
- 7% Social housing−21 pt vs the Netherlands
- 9% Private rental−5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 82.9% Dutch background+10.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 11.7% Rest of Europe+2.4 pt vs the Netherlands
- 5.7% Outside Europe−12.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 34.4% Lower+8.4 pt vs the Netherlands
- 42.2% Intermediate+1.5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 23.4% Higher−9.9 pt vs the Netherlands
Share of adults in the neighbourhood who are (very) satisfied, RIVM Health Monitor 2024. The bar lines the neighbourhood up against all 11,734 neighbourhoods with a figure in the monitor: half of them sit between 87 and 93 percent, so a few points move a neighbourhood from the middle to the tail. "Not (very) satisfied" is neutral and dissatisfied together, because the monitor does not publish those two separately. A neighbourhood average, so it says nothing about this particular home.
Shares in the Oud Grootebroek neighbourhood, source CBS. Each share is rounded on its own, so the total can land just off 100.
31 reports in the neighbourhood over the latest full year
- 29% Theft / burglary−10 pt vs the Netherlands
- 32.3% Othersame as the Netherlands
- 22.6% Violence and threats+12.6 pt vs the Netherlands
- 12.9% Vandalism+3.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 3.2% Public order−5.5 pt vs the Netherlands
Source Police/CBS, neighbourhood level, latest full calendar year. Only crimes reported to the police; willingness to report differs by offence and by area. A neighbourhood with shops or nightlife counts visitors’ reports too, so busy does not automatically mean unsafe.
Liveability class: very good
Leefbaarometer 3.0 (Dutch Ministry of the Interior / RIGO), 2024 edition. The scale is by definition a deviation from the national average: 0 IS the Netherlands, and that is the tick on the bar. The bar itself is the place among all neighbourhoods, because they do not sit symmetrically around zero: the same small minus is mid-pack on one sub-scale and the tail on another. A model score for the whole neighbourhood, not a measurement at this address. Resident mix stays grey: a different population is not better or worse, only different.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods. The national figure comes from the same table and the same formula, so the comparison is between places rather than between definitions.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods.
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
16 permits within 500 m · 86 construction plans within 1 km · 13 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Features
Stations
Schools
61st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 308 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
58th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 234 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
60th percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 303 pupils
Disadvantage score 44: more disadvantage than 81% of schools
37th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 231 pupils
Disadvantage score 3: more disadvantage than 20% of schools
99th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 303 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
10th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 13 pupils · total 123 pupils
Disadvantage score 25: more disadvantage than 66% of schools
44th percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 306 pupils
Disadvantage score 12: more disadvantage than 46% of schools
13th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 231 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
26th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 152 pupils
Disadvantage score 8: more disadvantage than 36% of schools
78th percentile: high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 326 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no exam results · PRO
57th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 280 exam candidates
46th percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 69 exam candidates
23rd percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 297 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.