Price drops in and around Ridderkerk
More homes in and around Ridderkerk whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
A.M. de Jongstraat 15
Apartment at A.M. de Jongstraat 15 in Ridderkerk (Oost neighbourhood). The home was built in 1967 and has 75 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label F. The nearest railway station is Barendrecht (3.6 km). The nearest primary school is Kindcentrum de Noord (352 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted30 Jul 2026€ 285,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale1 Jul 2026€ 295,000
Property details
- Living area
- 75 m²
- Construction year
- 1967
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- F
- WOZ value
- € 277,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Oost, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Poor (label F/G)343 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- PoorF
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated155 persons
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share18.6%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High19%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away11.9 km
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place3.1 ratio
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)13%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)86.3%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)85.1%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Glass horticulture area within 1 km
- Very many glasshouses (strong light nuisance)62,052 m²
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby10
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Foundation risk
- High risklarge
- Average lowest groundwater level (GLG)
- Deep, risk of pile rot152 m above sea level
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Very deep (above 2 m)2.38 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Elevated emissions75 kg/m2/yr
- Distance to nearest emission source
- nearby463 m
- Distance to groundwater protection area
- Adjacent to protected area37 m
- Distance to tram/metro line
- Far away3.2 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Above-average nuisance6.4%
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10 µg/m³
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- Elevated1.9%
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Multiple sources4
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot2,156 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical750 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.6%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.791 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away10.7 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)19.5 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Well away (>2 km)3 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit · 3 construction plans within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
13th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 296 pupils
Disadvantage score 53: more disadvantage than 86% of schools
26th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 297 pupils
Disadvantage score 15: more disadvantage than 51% of schools
84th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 380 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
15th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 536 pupils
Disadvantage score 95: more disadvantage than 97% of schools
51st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 272 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
19th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 184 pupils
Disadvantage score 47: more disadvantage than 83% of schools
13th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 361 pupils
Disadvantage score 12: more disadvantage than 47% of schools
23rd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 12: more disadvantage than 46% of schools
23rd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 240 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
73rd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 113 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
74th percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 99 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO
15th percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 244 exam candidates
95th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 58 exam candidates
14th percentile: low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 42 exam candidates
64th percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 131 exam candidates
29th percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 58 exam candidates
95th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO · 36 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.