Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Dordtsestraatweg 741 D
Apartment at Dordtsestraatweg 741 in Rotterdam (Vreewijk neighbourhood). The home was built in 1923 and has 111 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Zuidplein (1.5 km). The nearest primary school is De Mare (221 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced28 Jul 2026€ 329,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale29 Jun 2026€ 349,000
Property details
- Living area
- 111 m²
- Construction year
- 1923
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 279,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Vreewijk, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Share of social assistance recipients
- High8.6%
- Severe loneliness (neighbourhood)
- High18.7%
- Liveability class
- Weakweak
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.1516 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.2225 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share26.1%
- Net labour participation
- Low60%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High22.9%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental71%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away6.1 km
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place2.84 ratio
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)72.2%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)67.9%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance10%
- Noise load
- Loud67 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive57 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby15
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside38.2%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors38.2%
- Foundation risk
- High risklarge
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.04 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels4%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Elevated emissions51 kg/m2/yr
- Distance to nearest transmission mast
- Transmission mast nearby (<100 m)59 m
- Distance to sprayed crop
- Nearby (50–100 m)63 m
- Distance to airport
- Nearby9.8 km
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.4%
- Environmental health risk (MGR)
- Elevated6.7%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)
- Elevated2.2 µg/kg
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Generous plot280 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical660 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.897 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away17.4 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)21.8 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)4 km
- Distance to railway line
- Far from rail1.4 km
- Distance to arable crop
- Far away (>250 m)1.8 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 permits within 500 m · 33 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
51st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 79 pupils · total 641 pupils
Disadvantage score 89: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
97th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 194 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
17th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 522 pupils
Disadvantage score 136: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
94th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 192 pupils
Disadvantage score 81: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
30th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 234 pupils
Disadvantage score 93: more disadvantage than 97% of schools
3rd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 159 pupils
Disadvantage score 61: more disadvantage than 90% of schools
16th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 379 pupils
Disadvantage score 138: more disadvantage than 100% of schools
46th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 178 pupils
Disadvantage score 66: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
35th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 164 pupils
Disadvantage score 58: more disadvantage than 89% of schools
82nd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 318 pupils
Disadvantage score 118: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
10th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 101 exam candidates
95th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 76 exam candidates
68th percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 51 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · VWO
81st percentile: high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 132 exam candidates
9th percentile: low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 163 exam candidates
87th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 87 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.