Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
1e Middellandstraat 59 A
Apartment at 1e Middellandstraat 59A in Rotterdam (Middelland neighbourhood). The home was built in 1902 and has 118 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Rotterdam Centraal (745 m). The nearest primary school is KC Het Oude Westen (314 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced28 Jul 2026€ 450,000−€ 45,000
- Listed for sale19 Jun 2026€ 495,000
Property details
- Living area
- 118 m²
- Construction year
- 1902
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 460,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Middelland, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated90 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.2386 score
- Hospitality within 25 m
- Hospitality within 25 m3
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime81.3 per 1,000 residents
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)80.5%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)79.8%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure23
- Permits <500 m (3 months)
- Very high construction activity8
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport4.5 km
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive56 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby18
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.2 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside35.6%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors35.7%
- Foundation risk
- High risklarge
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Very deep (above 2 m)2.03 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels4%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Above-average nuisance7.4%
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10.4 µg/m³
- Road traffic noise
- Considerable noise15.6%
- Noise load
- Heavy64 dB
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.4%
- Environmental health risk (MGR)
- Elevated6.7%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)
- Elevated2.3 µg/kg
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)136 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.21 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away22.1 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)26.8 km
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.3 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)5.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
22 permits within 500 m · 35 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
27th percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 109 pupils
Disadvantage score 40: more disadvantage than 79% of schools
50th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 198 pupils
Disadvantage score 77: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
74th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 339 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
54th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 332 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
31st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 54: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
40th percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 111 pupils
Disadvantage score 28: more disadvantage than 69% of schools
34th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 347 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
53rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 23: more disadvantage than 63% of schools
58th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 227 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
11th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 60 pupils · total 501 pupils
Disadvantage score 166: more disadvantage than 100% of schools
no exam results · VWO
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
48th percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 170 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
9th percentile: low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · HAVO/VWO · 178 exam candidates
65th percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 71 exam candidates
13th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 177 exam candidates
97th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · HAVO/VWO · 36 exam candidates
8th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 55 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.