Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Calandstraat 39 F
Apartment at Calandstraat 39 in Rotterdam (Nieuwe Werk neighbourhood). The home was built in 1975 and has 47 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label A+++. The nearest railway station is Dijkzigt (876 m). The nearest primary school is De Schalm (750 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced29 Jul 2026€ 438,000−€ 12,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 450,000
Property details
- Living area
- 47 m²
- Construction year
- 1975
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- A+++
- WOZ value
- € 451,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Nieuwe Werk, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance to business district
- Adjacent to business park0 m
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime107.6 per 1,000 residents
- Parking tariff
- Very high rate€ 6.42
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure8
- Capacity nearest WWTP
- Very large treatment plant423,000 i.e.
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby20
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby8
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside41.3%
- Foundation risk
- High risklarge
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)0.73 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels1%
- Distance to airport
- Nearby6.2 km
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10.1 µg/m³
- Road traffic noise
- Considerable noise15.5%
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Disturbing51 dB
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.4%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)
- Elevated2.3 µg/kg
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.3 °C
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,159 m²
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Share of renewable energy
- High share of renewable energy76%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions3 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)18 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+++
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical100 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.966 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
7 permits within 500 m · 36 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
52nd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 210 pupils
Disadvantage score 39: more disadvantage than 79% of schools
66th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 85 pupils · total 638 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 355 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
54th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 63 pupils · total 529 pupils
Disadvantage score 19: more disadvantage than 58% of schools
21st percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 122 pupils
Disadvantage score 45: more disadvantage than 82% of schools
27th percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 109 pupils
Disadvantage score 40: more disadvantage than 79% of schools
54th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 61 pupils · total 740 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
50th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 198 pupils
Disadvantage score 77: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
31st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 54: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
2nd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 195 pupils
Disadvantage score 81: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
98th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 176 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
61st percentile: average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 53 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO
97th percentile: high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 103 exam candidates
93rd percentile: high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 108 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
31st percentile: average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 95 exam candidates
62nd percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.