Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Paradijslaan 132 B03
Apartment at Paradijslaan 132 in Rotterdam (Nieuw Crooswijk neighbourhood). The home was built in 1921 and has 74 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Rotterdam Noord (989 m). The nearest primary school is Noen (220 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted27 Jul 2026€ 550,000−€ 35,000
- Sold (conditional)3 Jun 2026€ 585,000
Property details
- Living area
- 74 m²
- Construction year
- 1921
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 348,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Nieuw Crooswijk, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated160 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1059 score
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental64%
- Buildings under construction in the neighbourhood
- intensive building activity18 buildings
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)82.3%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)82.6%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure14
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport4.4 km
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby12
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside39.2%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors43.3%
- Foundation risk
- High risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Above-average nuisance7.3%
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10.6 µg/m³
- Road traffic noise
- Considerable noise12.4%
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.4%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.8 °C
- Share of social assistance recipients
- Elevated6.6%
- Proportion of flexible employment contracts
- Much flexible work37.5%· NL 27%
- Share of households lowest 40% income
- above-average many low incomes52.2%
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical350 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.089 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away21.6 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)28 km
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.6 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)4.5 km
- Distance to overhead high-voltage line
- Well away7,818 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
11 permits within 500 m · 31 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
61st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 368 pupils
Disadvantage score 65: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
45th percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 364 pupils
Disadvantage score 56: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
53rd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 186 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
6th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 217 pupils
Disadvantage score 62: more disadvantage than 90% of schools
23rd percentile: low · DIA · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 141 pupils
Disadvantage score 51: more disadvantage than 85% of schools
59th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 128 pupils
Disadvantage score 40: more disadvantage than 80% of schools
69th percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 125 pupils
Disadvantage score 22: more disadvantage than 61% of schools
71st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 109 pupils
Disadvantage score 38: more disadvantage than 77% of schools
84th percentile: high · DIA · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 348 pupils
Disadvantage score 21: more disadvantage than 60% of schools
36th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 149 pupils
Disadvantage score 56: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
3rd percentile: low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 224 exam candidates
5th percentile: low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 70 exam candidates
5th percentile: low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.2 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 180 exam candidates
59th percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 106 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · PRO
21st percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 55 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
51st percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 41 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.